NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Burpo DATE TYPED: 02/02/00 HB 239
SHORT TITLE: Method of Valuation for Residential Property SB
ANALYST: Williams

REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01

See Fiscal Impact Narrative

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Relates to HB366

SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD) (analysis is not yet available)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



The bill would authorize a new method for determining the value of residential property and limit valuation increases. If the residence has not been sold, then the value would be determined by the prior year value multiplied by a percentage change P, plus the value of improvements less the decrease in value of the property from the preceding tax year. If a county has a sales ratio below .85, then the assessor must use existing statutory authority for valuation for property tax year 2001. Then, the assessor shall use the previously outlined methodology.



The percentage change P is defined as the annual percent change of various indexes, including:



1. New Mexico repeat sales house price index

2. Consumer price index-all urban

3. Implicit price deflator index for state and local government purchases of goods and services

4. Average annual weekly earnings for private sector employees in the county

5. Any other measure developed by the county to accurately reflect housing value changes



The index percentage change must be between 0 and 5 percent. The county must establish the index by August 1, 2000 for tax years 2001 through 2005. The Secretary of Taxation and Revenue must approve or disapprove the proposal. If disapproved, the county has until December 1, 2000 to develop an alternative index. The index would be set every five years.



If the new valuation method results in a higher level of valuation, the county can apply to TRD for an order to authorize the assessor to reassess all residential property in the county or apply a percentage adjustment to reduce all residential valuations. The county can also apply for an order to change the valuation of residential property if there are special or unusual circumstances.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



TRD analysis of the bill is in progress, but is not yet available. The fiscal impact section will be updated upon receipt of that analysis.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



Relates to HB366.



AW/gm