NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: McKibben DATE TYPED: 02/11/00 HB
SHORT TITLE: Income Tax Credit Funded by Tribal Gaming Back Payments SB 336
ANALYST: Williams


REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00* FY01
51,300 to 66,200 Non-Recurring General Fund
(51,300 to 66,200) General Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



Conflicts with S 336, Relates to HB 19 and HB 71



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Gaming Control Board (GCB)

Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)

Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



This bill provides for an income tax credit to distribute payments of back payments due associated with the state's share of Native American gaming net win on slot machines. The credit would apply to each resident, spouse and dependents beginning tax year 2000. Inmates of a public institution for more than six months during the taxable year would not be eligible.



DFA is to determine the amount of revenue sharing payments or portions of payments due prior to January 1, 2000 which were collected by the state from January 1 through September 30, 2000 and for the period October 1 through September 30 thereafter. The credit would not apply if applicable payments are less than $1 million. If the credit exceeds liability, the taxpayer could receive a refund.









FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



There is some uncertainty on the exact amount of tribal casino net win subject to revenue sharing provisions. However, the following estimates have been prepared based on LFC analysis of estimated total liability and total payments to date for each gaming tribe or pueblo.



Because of the lack of compliance with the existing revenue sharing agreements and because of the inability of the state to collect the back payments still due, there is considerable uncertainty on the extent to which and timing of collection of these estimated payments. After a considerable discussion during the interim, it appears the state's options appear to be arbitration, suing in federal court if willing to waive sovereign immunity or renegotiation.



For the time period of the effective dates of each compact through the end of December 1999, total revenue sharing liability by gaming tribes is estimated by LFC staff at $104,100.0. Through that same time period, gaming tribes and pueblos paid $37,900.0 in revenue sharing payments and an additional $14,900.0 which was not identified as either revenue sharing or regulatory fees. Because of the uncertainty on how to classify the payments of $14,900.0, there is a range on this estimate.



1) Excluding the Unidentified Payments



Total Due: $104,100.0

Total Paid: $37,900

Remaining Due $66,200



2) Including the Unidentified Payments As Revenue Sharing



Total Due: $104,100.0

Total Paid: $52,800

Remaining Due: $51,300



Thus, the potential magnitude of the back payment revenue related to slot machine net win would range from $51,300.0 to $66,200.0, with the total size of the credit at equal amounts, given that all back payments were paid.



In comparison, according to the GCB analysis, an estimated $67,000.0 could be realized by the fund if all tribes were to pay revenue sharing back payments. TRD estimate approximately $51,200.0 in past due payments.



Note that back payments are not included in the consensus General Fund revenue estimates.



Approximately 1.5 million individuals are estimated to receive the credit. Thus, each individual could receive from $34 to $44.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



TRD suggested defining the source of the population estimate to avoid disputes over the population number used. The population of New Mexico could range from 1.5 to 1.75 million.





OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



Note all residents of New Mexico may not file a personal income tax return; however, the credit is based on population.



AW/jsp