NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Pinto DATE TYPED: 02/08/00 HB
SHORT TITLE: Right-of-Way Negotiations SB 339
ANALYST: Valdes


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY00 FY01 FY00 FY01

See Narrative

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to NA



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



State Highway and Transportation Department



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



This bill limits the authority of the State Highway and Transportation Department (SHTD) to enter into right-of-way agreements with tribes to a maximum term of twenty years. It also broadens the SHTD authority to enter into cooperative agreements with tribes.



Significant Issues



Under current law the term of rights-of-way acquired from tribes is not limited in duration so compensation need only be paid once. Under the constraints of this bill, SHTD would be required to re-negotiate right-of-way agreements and compensation every twenty years or abandon the right-of-way.



The twenty year cap on rights-of-way could also result in the state making extensive capital investment by constructing and maintaining the highways built on these rights-of-way, yet not receiving full value for this investment due to the expiration of the maximum twenty year term. Also, if right-of-way agreements cannot successfully be re-negotiated at the expiration of the proposed twenty year term, this could result in segments of highway being removed from the state highway system with the potential of loss of access to the traveling public or deteriorated maintenance.





FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



Twenty year maximum right-of-way agreements could increase the department's long-term cost of right-of-way acquisition and the administrative cost of re-negotiation.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



This bill would substantially impact SHTD's current administrative procedure for right-of-way acquisition by requiring renegotiation or abandonment of the right-of-way at the end of the twenty year period.



While SHTD currently has the authority to enter into cooperative agreements with tribes pursuant to the Joint Powers Act, this bill directly authorizing SHTD to enter into such agreements would enhance the department's authority and streamline the process for entering into joint powers agreements.



MFV/gm