NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Gonzales DATE TYPED: 2-4-01 HB 23
SHORT TITLE: Amend Enrollment Growth Program Units SB
ANALYST: Segura


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 4,000.0 Recurring GF



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



State Department of Education (SDE)

LFC Files



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 23 amends Section 22-8-23.1 of the Public School Finance Act to change the method of calculating enrollment growth program units.



Significant Issues



Prior to the 1999-2000 school year, funding for schools was based upon current year membership, and a district that had a growth in membership equal to or greater than 1 percent was allocated an additional 0.05 units for each additional student.



With the shift to prior year funding beginning with the 1999-2000 school year, new students do not generate grade or other program units the first year in which they are enrolled. In an effort to address the problem, the 1999 General Appropriation Act included language to increase the growth factor form 0.05 to 1.00 for the 1999-2000 school year and the 2000 General Appropriation Act included a categorical appropriation of $2,554.1 to be distributed to districts with a growth rate of greater than 1 percent for the 2000-2001 school year.



According to SDE, the bill would provide a more comprehensive method of recognizing membership growth, which had not been permanently addressed when the shift to prior year funding was enacted. The bill would change the calculation of growth units based on the difference between the current year 40 day MEM and the prior year 40 day MEM. For all districts with an increase in MEM, additional growth units would be calculated by multiplying the difference by the current year average number of adjusted program units per student. Additionally, districts experiencing a growth rate of 1 percent or greater would also be entitled to marginal growth units calculated by multiplying the difference greater than 1 percent by a factor of 0.05.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



House Bill 23 appropriates $4,000.0 from the general fund and the appropriation would be recurring. The amount is based on 1999-2000 membership and units and 2000-2001 unit value. The appropriation would cover the estimated enrollment growth units for FY2002 at the FY 2001 unit value of $2,632.32.



It should be notes that the State Superintendent has raised the 2000-2001 unit value from $2,632.32to $2,647.56 as of January 29,2001. Based on this change the appropriation may have to be adjusted to cover the cost of the estimated enrollment growth units.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



The House Education Committee is currently developing House Bill 3, and reviewing recommendations for Public School Support funding. The appropriation could be included in House Bill 3.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS



1. What impact will the change in unit value have on the level of appropriation contained in the bill?



RS/njw