NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Mohorovic DATE TYPED: 01/24/01 HB 66
SHORT TITLE: Amend Electronic Authentication of Documents SB
ANALYST: Carrillo


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 2,000.0 Non-Rec GF
$*



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



*See Fiscal Impact Section



Relates to HB88, Amend Procurement Code; HB 232, Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.





SOURCES OF INFORMATION

General Services Department

Information Technology Management Office

State Commission of Public Records



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 66 proposes to amend the Electronic Authentication of Documents Act to provide for technological neutrality.



Significant Issues



HB 66 impacts the Secretary of State. An agency bill analysis was requested from the Secretary of State's office and as of the date of this FIR has not responded.



According to Information Technology Management Office (ITMO) staff, a single, adaptable architecture is essential to providing services coherently with security and reliability. Such a system will accommodate the streamlining of government business processes to capture savings and deliver citizen-centric government information and services.





FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The ITMO's staff has estimated the estimated impact of HB 66 to be between $2 and $3 million (general fund) to implement a statewide electronic system, depending on the technical solution selected. In addition, there could be approximately $500.0 in recurring (general fund) technical support (personnel, maintenance).





CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



HB 66 is related to HB 88 (Amend Procurement Code) and HB232 (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act). In part, HB88 proposes to amend the Procurement Code to authorize electronic notices and responses. HB 232 intends to enact the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act and to establish standards for the use of electronic records and signatures in transactions.



WC/sb