NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Stewart DATE TYPED: 03/09/01 HB 258/aHJC/aHBIC
SHORT TITLE: Extend Applicability of Insurance Fraud Act SB
ANALYST: Valenzuela


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02

NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Office of the Attorney General

Public Regulation Commission



SUMMARY



Synopsis of the HJC amendment



The House Judiciary Committee (HJC) amendment deletes Section 1(i) of the bill, which prohibited the Superintendent of Insurance from issuing a license to a person convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust.



Synopsis of the HBIC amendment



The House Business and Industry Committee (HBIC) amendment to House Bill 258 adds a new section to the Insurance Code relating to the licensure of producers (agents, brokers, solicitors, etc.). Specifically, the new section gives the Insurance Division of the Public Regulation Commission (PRC) the authority to contract with a non-governmental entity to handle perform the ministerial functions of the licensing process and to collect a fee from applicants that is remitted to the division. The division is also given the authority to adopt by rule any uniform standards and procedures necessary to participate in the national producer registry.



Synopsis of Original Bill



House Bill 258 amends the Insurance Code and numerous related statutes to require the Superintendent of Insurance to use a criminal history background check for applicant's seeking an insurance license or for current license holders involved in disciplinary cases related to license continuation. The bill stipulates that the Department of Public Safety (DPS) or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) shall performs the checks, at the expense of the applicant.



Aside from minor technical revisions, House Bill 258 also clarifies the applicability of various insurance-related statutes to licensees, particularly the Insurance Fraud Act applying to health maintenance organizations (HMOs). A detailed list by section has been provided by the Office of the Attorney General as detailed below:



Significant Issues



Enactment of House Bill 258 will provide the Superintendent of Insurance the authority to obtain criminal history information of prospective applicant's for insurance licenses. Federal law prohibits persons with felony convictions for dishonesty or breach of trust from being employed in the insurance industry.



The second substantive impact of the bill would be that it would expand the applicability of portions of the Insurance Code to businesses that may not underwrite risk.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



Enactment of House Bill 258 would have no fiscal impact on the PRC or other state agency. The bill carries no appropriation and requires that any fees be paid by the applicant.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



Enactment of House Bill 258 would unlikely place any noticeable administrative burden on the PRC or other state agency.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



The PRC identifies a conflict as detailed below:



Section 59A-11-7 states that: "The Criminal Offender Employment Act shall govern any consideration of criminal record in connection with application for any license under this article." This may conflict with the bill's amendment of 59A-11-2 by adding new subsection I, at page 4, line 13. Federal law permits the Superintendent to grant a waiver of the prohibition; 59A-11-7 would govern the exercise of that waiver authority; but the proposed 59A-11-2(I) will prohibit the waiver completely.



MFV/ar/njw