NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Larranaga DATE TYPED: 2/18/01 HB 368
SHORT TITLE: Amend Rural Infrastructure Act SB
ANALYST: Belmares


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
See Fiscal Implications section below.



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)





Duplicates Senate Bill 181



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Rural Infrastructure Act

Department of Environment

New Mexico Finance Authority



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 368 amends the Rural Infrastructure Act by removing the five percent loan interest rate associated with the Rural Infrastructure Revolving Loan Fund and allowing the Department of Environment to set interest rates for loans from the fund at or below market rates. The bill also allows existing loans to be refinanced at a reduced rate. The bill substitutes an entity's average residential user cost of $18.00 per month with a Median Household Income (MHI) of less than ninety percent of the State MHI as a condition of making a zero percent loan. Currently, only water facilities can be financed through the Rural Infrastructure fund program. The bill adds "wastewater facilities" to the types of facilities that can be financed. The bill also shifts duties associated with the Rural Infrastructure Act from the Environmental Improvement Board to the Cabinet Secretary of the Department of Environment.



Significant Issues



The Rural Infrastructure Act allows for financial assistance to local authorities for the construction or modification of water supply facilities to correct demonstrably hazardous or inadequate conditions. The Rural Infrastructure Program is administered by the Department of Environment. The Rural Infrastructure Act established an interest rate of five percent for loans to New Mexico communities of less than 10,000 population for construction and upgrades to community water systems.



Currently, many existing loans to small communities are at 5.5 or 7.0 percent. The Department of Environment has indicated the balance in the Rural Infrastructure Fund is increasing faster than loan funds can be awarded due to the current interest rate being too high for current market conditions.



The Department of Environment and the New Mexico Finance Authority have indicated the current loan interest rate specified in the Act is too high for market conditions and the bill would increase the success of the Rural Infrastructure Program.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The Rural Infrastructure Fund currently has a balance in excess of $8 million which is available for new loans. Annual repayments of principal and interest to the fund is approximately $1.5 million. The Department of Environment has indicated the loan program will not be adversely affected by lower interest rates to borrowing communities.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



House Bill 368 will not create additional administrative costs; however, the bill will require the Department of Environment to make an amendment to current regulations to provide a funding priority system for wastewater systems comparable to the guidance for water systems currently provided in regulation.



DUPLICATION



House Bill 368 duplicates Senate Bill 181.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



The Department of Environment supports HB368 and has indicated the bill is supported by the New Mexico Municipal League and the New Mexico Rural Water Association.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS



House Bill 368 adds wastewater systems to the type of facilities that can be financed under the Rural Infrastructure Act. However, since the bill does not establish a percentage of funds available from the Infrastructure Revolving Loan Fund for either water systems or wastewater systems, a separate funding priority systems, as proposed by the Department of Environment, seems to indicate water and wastewater systems are not competing for the same pool of funds within the Rural Infrastructure Revolving Loan Fund.



EB/njw