NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Hamilton DATE TYPED: 2/15/01 HB 446
SHORT TITLE: License to Carry Act SB
ANALYST: Rael


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02

See Narrative

Recurring GF



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCE OF INFORMATION



Attorney General Office

Administrative Office of the District Attorneys

Administrative Office of the Courts



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



The License to Carry Act provides for statewide, uniform standards for the issuance of concealed handgun licenses for security and defense. The Act provides as follows:

i) Definitions are contained in Section 3.

ii) Licenses. The county sheriffs are authorized to begin issuing licenses in July, 2001. Each license is valid for five years. (Section 4) The county sheriff may promulgate rules regarding licensure, confiscation, and provisions to allow property owners and employers to disallow the carrying of a concealed weapon on that person's property. (Section 12)

iii) Applicants. Applicants for a license must meet minimum criteria including being a U.S. citizen and New Mexico resident (or being stationed in the armed forces here), not a fugitive from justice, not a felon or under indictment for a felony, not convicted of a misdemeanor offense involving a crime of violence in the previous five years, mentally competent, and not addicted to drugs or alcohol and having completed a firearms training course. (Section 5 and 8) The application must include several statements under oath, pay a fee of $50.00, and provide two full sets of fingerprints and other certified documents proving that the applicant meets the minimum requirements. (Section 6) There is a $50.00 renewal fee of a license. (Section 7)

iv) Issuance of a License. The county sheriff is required to investigate whether the person is qualified to receive the license. The fingerprints are forwarded to the federal bureau of investigation for a national criminal records check. The county sheriff is required to check the records to verify the accuracy. (Section 6) The county sheriff has 60 days to issue the license or deny it, giving grounds for the denial. An applicant who is denied a license may submit more information and can seek judicial review of the denial. (Section 7)

v) Court Review. The district court has jurisdiction to review a denial of a license. If the county sheriff is reversed, the applicant may be reimbursed by the county for the costs of bringing the appeal. (Section 7)

vi) Personal Protection Fund. All fees collected by the Act shall be placed in a license to carry fund administered by the county treasurer so that it may carry out the provisions of the Act. The county treasurer shall invest the fund as all other county funds are invested, and income from the investment of the fund shall be credited to the fund. Any funds remaining at the end of the fiscal year shall remain in the fund. (Section13).

vii) Amendment. Section 30-7-2 NMSA is amended to allow a person with a license to carry a concealed weapon lawfully.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



See Administrative Implications.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The AOC reports that the fiscal implications on the judiciary will directly follow the amount of litigation that is generated or, alternatively, avoided by the Act. The courts hear appeals only from a denial of a license. Because the requirements for licensure are clear, there should not be a great deal of litigation generated by the Act. The impact on the courts likely will be minimal.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



SB 148, HB 277 and HB 446 are very similar with the following exceptions:



SB 148 HB 277 HB 446
Department of Public Safety issues and revokes license Department of Public Safety issues and revokes license County sheriffs issues and revokes license
Section 6 (B)(6) and (8) are separate provisions (6) and (8) are contained in (6) Same as SB 148
Section 6 (B)(9) regarding the description of the gun's action is added Does not contain this provision Does not contain this provision
Section 7 (D) DPS and County sheriff make check of applicant's records Same as SB 148 Section 7 (D) County sheriff make check of applicant's records
Section 7 (C) includes a sentence on DPS maintaining a database of licensees Does not contain this provision Section 7 (C) includes a sentence on County Sheriff maintaining a database of licensees
Section 7(D) regarding the description of the gun's action is added Does not contain this provision Does not contain this provision
Section 8 (A) regarding DPS sets standards for training courses Same as SB 148 Same as SB 148
Section 8 (A) regarding course lasting >10 hrs Same as SB 148 Does not contain this provision
Section 12 (D) regarding private employer's right to disallow privilege during work shift is added Does not contain this provision Same as SB 148
Section 13 regarding creating state treasury fund Same as SB 148 creates county treasury fund
Section 30-7-2 (C) includes a sentence making second or subsequent convictions a misdemeanor Does not contain this provision Does not contain this provision


TECHNICAL ISSUES