NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Stewart DATE TYPED: 02/21/01 HB 604
SHORT TITLE: Insurance Fraud Fund Appropriation SB
ANALYST: Valenzuela


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 160.3 Recurring Insurance Fraud Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Relates to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act made for the Insurance Fraud Bureau



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

Office of the Attorney General

Public Regulation Commission



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 604 appropriates $160.3 from the Insurance Fraud Fund to the Public Regulation Commission (PRC) to hire two additional investigators. The bill contains a non-reverting clause.



Significant Issues



The funding and new positions would go to the Insurance Fraud Bureau of the PRC.



The House Appropriations and Finance Committee (HAFC) added two new positions (an investigator and prosecutor) to the Bureau to the base executive recommendation of 7.00 FTE in response to the agency's request. Consequently, the Bureau is funded for nine positions. Enactment of House Bill 604 would increase the staff to 11.00 FTE: four attorneys, six special agents (investigators) and an administrative secretary.



The Insurance Fraud Act gives the Superintendent of Insurance discretion to use assistant attorneys general in the investigation and prosecution of insurance fraud cases.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



Aside from the appropriation contained in the bill, the bill would not have a fiscal impact.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



Enactment of the bill would have place an administrative burden on the Bureau and PRC, who would need to set up these two new positions, in addition to the two positions added by HAFC.



MFV/ar