NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.



F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Sanchez DATE TYPED: 03/06/01 HB 625/aHGUAC/aHAFC
SHORT TITLE: Disposition of State Property SB
ANALYST: Carrillo


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 50.0 Recurring Other State Funds



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)





REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02
$ 50.0 Recurring Other State Funds



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Commission on Higher Education (CHE)

State Department of Education (SDE)

General Services Department (GSD)

Office of the Attorney General (AG)



SUMMARY



      Synopsis of HAFC Amendment



The House Appropriations and Finance Committee amendment to House Bill 625/aHGUAC adds the State Police Division (Department of Public Safety) to those enumerated as exempt from the provisions of the proposed legisation.



The remainder of the FIR is unchanged.



Synopsis of HGUAC Amendment



The House Government and Urban Affairs Committee amendment to House Bill 625 adds the provision allowing real or tangible personal property to be donated to an Indian nation, tribe or pueblo.



Synopsis of Original Bill



House Bill 625 proposes to:



Require state agencies to give the Federal Property Assistance Bureau of the General Services Department (FPAB/GSD) a right of first refusal when the agency is disposing of its obsolete, worn-out or unusable tangible personal property.



Require a written determination prior to public bodies selling or otherwise disposing of real or tangible personal property. It requires that any disposition to an Indian tribe, pueblo or nation be by negotiated sale, while allowing donations to other public bodies in the state. Any disposition to any other entity would require competitive sealed bids or public auction. If a state agency wishes to dispose of real or personal property, it must be done through the FPAB/GSD. The bill also requires a state agency to grant a right of first refusal to dispose of the agency's tangible personal property, and allows a school district to do so if it wishes. This bill would also make the provisions of this section applicable to computer hardware (previously exempted), but adds a new exemption for property acquired by a museum though abandonment procedures pursuant to the Abandoned Cultural Properties Act.



Significant Issues



The Office of the Attorney General (AG) staff indicates:



By treating dispositions between state agencies, local public bodies and school districts differently than those involving Indian nations, tribes, and pueblos, Section 2 is contrary to this office's current view of the law, which is believed to allow public bodies to make donations to Indian tribes, pueblos and nations treating them the same as any other public body in the state).



Application of the competitive bids/public auction requirements of Section 2 of the bill may not be appropriate as to certain dispositions, like between state museums and their foundations, leases of restaurants, gift shops or other portions of state museums.



GSD staff notes this bill establishes the FPAB as a recycle center for items of tangible personal property no longer needed by state agencies. It centralizes redistribution of property purchased with public money and makes that property available to others, with a handling fee to support GSD's enhanced role in recycling property. Redistribution of property ensures maximum life cycle usage and reduces possible mishandling of disposal property that is unusable by the purchasing agency or that can be reused.



GSD also states there are currently 518 authorized organizations registered with the FPAB including state agencies; counties; municipalities; school districts; state institutions of higher learning; governmental units of an Indian nation, tribe or pueblo; and authorized non-profit organizations. Redistributing property among these entities will benefit citizens who pay state and local tax, and clients of non-profit organizations.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



GSD staff estimates approximately $50.0 would be needed to support an additional FTE (salary, benefits, travel, etc.). The handling fees generated and collected should cover the cost. State agencies and others obtaining property through the program will save money on office furniture, supplies, etc., that are available through the FPAB program.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



AG staff states:



Section 2 adds a requirement that a "written determination" be made (page 4, line 24 - 25), but it is not clear who is to make it-the approving authority or the public body disposing of the property. This provision should be amended to clarify who needs to make that written determination.



Because state educational institutions are expressly exempted from the application of this statute (see: (G)(2), page 6, lines 4 - 6; 13-6-4(C), page 7 beginning at line 24), it may be appropriate to delete the phrase "state educational institution" throughout Section 13-6-2 NMSA 1978 as currently enacted and in the proposed amendments (at page 5, lines 1, 4, 9 and 25-along with requirement for approval by Commission on Higher Education at page 6, lines 6 - 7; and page 6, lines 16 and 21 - 22).



While the new subsection B to Section 13-6-2 NMSA 1978 requires a state agency to give the FPAB the right of first refusal to dispose of that agency's tangible personal property (page 5, line 14 - 19, consistent with the right of first refusal required in the new subsection E of Section 13-6-1 NMSA 1978 - page 3, lines 13 - 16), the reference in subsection A requiring state agency disposition of property through the bureau applies to real property, as well (page 5, lines 12 - 13). Is that the intent of the bill? Secondly, what happens if the FPAB chooses not to exercise its right of first refusal? As the bill is currently worded, it appears that the FPAB will have to seek competitive bids or conduct a public auction. If that is not the intent, these provisions should be amended.



AMENDMENTS



GSD staff suggests: Page 7, between lines 6 and 7, insert: "(3) the state police division of the department of public safety".



WJC/njw:ar