NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: HGUAC DATE TYPED: 03/05/01 HB 878/HGUACS
SHORT TITLE: Consolidated Purchasing SB
ANALYST: Carrillo


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
Indeterminate



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to See section in text.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Public School Insurance Authority (PSIA)

General Services Department (GSD)

Health Policy Commission (HPC)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 878 as substituted by the House Government and Urban Affairs Committee proposes to amend the Health Care Purchasing Act (Section 13-7-1 through 13-7-4 NMSA 1978) to:



Include counties, municipalities, state educational institutions and other political subdivisions that wish to use the consolidated purchasing single process for the procurement of health care benefits (either the public agency pool or an allowance of those same entities to create or join another pool).



Reaffirms by statute that Social Security Numbers may not be required for health insurance identification purposes.



Requires a study be conducted on the feasibility of combining certain administrative functions of the agencies participating in the Health Care Purchasing Act. The study will be completed by December 1, 2001 and implementation of any combined functions by December 31, 2003. The substitute bill allows the agencies to enter into a joint powers agreement (JPA) or contracts with others to determine assessment to be levied against other agencies for one agency's provision of any services. It clarifies the agencies still retain responsibility for policy direction of the benefit plans.



Clarifies the exemption from the Insurance Code of the Public School Insurance Authority (PSIA), RHCA and public schools. It exempts these agencies from all provisions of the Insurance Code except for the Patient Protection Act, Mental Health Parity Act, and the Clean Claims Act.



Significant Issues



The Interagency Task Force (ITF) was created in 1997 as part of the Health Care Purchasing Act of 1997. The ITF members are:



RMD (general government employees, state and local public bodies),

PSIA (public schools),

APS (Albuquerque public schools), and

RHCA (PERA and ERA retired employees).



The purpose of the Act was to consolidate purchasing power (including risk) into a health care insurance pool so that health insurance would be more cost-effective, with higher quality and more accessibility through reduced rates, especially by encouraging health care providers in rural areas to participate in the consolidated plans.



The Health Policy Commission (HPC) states:



The HPC HJM18 report, Restructuring of Health Care Final Report 2000, state that value-based purchasing is a concept that combines cost-effective approaches of purchasing pools/cooperatives with choices of health plans based on quality. Throughout the nation, and in New Mexico with the recent consolidated purchasing of the Sate employees, retirees and public schools, purchasing pools are providing employers with added leverage in controlling costs and negotiating with healthcare plans.



Washington state created TEAMonitor, an interagency team working in partnership with health carriers to promote accessible, high-quality health care for managed care enrollees. TEAMonitor contracts with managed health care services of medicaid recipients, low-income individuals, public employees, and retired public employees.



The reduction of administrative costs and the improved ability of entities in the New Mexico Insurance Pool to negotiate, while representing more enrollees, may keep insurance costs from rising as quickly as they have in recent years. In addition, a larger New Mexico Insurance Pool may allow pool members to negotiate for better insurance coverage.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



HPC staff states an insurance purchasing pool may decrease both costs and the rate at which costs increase for entities that contribute into the pool.







The fiscal impact is unknown since the substitute bill allows for a JPA to determine assessments.



The RHCA staff indicates there could possibly be expenses incurred in the first year (FY02) for the study and implementation. Approximately $550.0 would be saved by the four entities overall beginning in the first year for Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) compliance, and efficiency savings would continue to result from consolidation of administrative functions.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



Unknown until completion of study.



RELATIONSHIP



HB 878 as substituted relates to:

SB 274, Amend NM Insurance Code

SB 209, Self-Insured health Care Act

SB 334, Amend Health Insurance Alliance Act

SB 375, Medical Insurance Pool Act

SB 478, Catastrophic Health Insurance

HB 275, Small Employer Catastrophic Group Health

HB 406, Self-Insurance Health Care Act



WJC/njw:ar