NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: King DATE TYPED: 03/06/01 HB 945
SHORT TITLE: Minimum Allowable Construction Cost SB
ANALYST: Taylor


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
NFI



Duplicates/Relates to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act None.



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Labor Department

General Services Department (GSD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



House Bill 945 strikes language that establishes a maximum allowable construction costs of $10 million for public works projects, other than road and highway construction or reconstruction projects, authorized as design and build projects. It adds a minimum project size requirement of $500,000.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The fiscal implications of the bill are indirect and positive. Allowing more public construction projects to be authorized for design and build should save money necessary for such projects since a profit-maximizing business would only adopt design-build if it was financially beneficial to do so. The benefits of the change are not readily quantifiable, however.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The Labor Department and General Services Department report that the bill would have no administrative implications for them.



BT/njw:ar