NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Rodella DATE TYPED: 01/24/01 HB HJM6
SHORT TITLE: Prohibit Transfer of Rio Grande Water Rights SB
ANALYST: Dotson


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Relates to Appropriation in The General Appropriation Act None



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Office of the State Engineer



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



This memorial supports and endorses the policy of the State Engineer that prohibits approval of water right transfer applications to transfer native Rio Grande water rights that exist above the latitude of the Otowi stream gage to below that latitude.



Significant Issues



According to the State Engineer, this bill would further discourage transfers of native Rio Grande water rights in northern New Mexico, above the Otowi gage, to water users in the Middle Rio Grande. Another significant issue arises from the technical requirements of the Rio Grande Compact. New Mexico's annual obligations to deliver Rio Grande water to below Elephant Butte Dam are based on the annual flow of water past the Otowi gage. The compact provides that New Mexico is entitled to continue annual depletions of water upstream from the Otowi gage that existed in 1929, when the compact was negotiated. The compact also requires that adjustments be made to the Otowi gage readings to reflect changes from the depletions that occurred in 1929. No such adjustments have ever been made.





FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The reduced flexibility in statewide water planning activities could possible negatively effect New Mexico's future economic development options.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



This memorial would add some weight to the Office of the State Engineer's long standing policy. According to the State Engineer, preserving the status quo by not passing this memorial would not affect current water administration by the Office of the State Engineer.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



HB 113 and HB 114 include appropriations for statewide water planning and implementation activities. The results of the regional water plans could conflict with HJM 006.



In analyzing HB 114, the State Engineer reported New Mexico's growth and desert climate require active management of water resources. Planning is a dynamic process and must continue. Regional water plans are needed to specify implementing programs and alternatives that actively manage the region's water resources.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



According to the State Engineer, the recital on page 2, lines 7-9 is technically incorrect. The phrase "without adjustment of the delivery schedules of the Rio Grande Compact." should be added after "…gage" to make it technically correct.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



According to the State Engineer, New Mexico is required by the Rio Grande Compact to deliver to below Elephant Butte Dam between 57% and 100% of all marginal increases in annual flow at the Otowi Gage. In a high water year, 100% of any additional water must be delivered by New Mexico to below the dam. In the event that depletions of Rio Grande water in Northern New Mexico were to decline as a result of non-use and non-transfer of existing water rights, and extra water flows across the Otowi Gage, then New Mexico would have an additional burden of delivering that water if the compact delivery schedules were not adjusted. However, there are no circumstances that suggest New Mexico's long-term water use in the Northern Rio Grande system will be below the 1929 depletion limit. Therefore, New Mexico has not sought, and does not believe it would be desirable to pursue, the complicated interstate process that would be required for any schedule adjustment. Thus, both the desire to inhibit wholesale transfers of water rights from acequias and New Mexico's long-term water use expectations support retaining the present prohibition on water rights transfers across the Otowi gage.



AMENDMENTS



See Technical Issues.



PD/njw/ar