NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Nava DATE TYPED: 02/28/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: GO Bonds Secured by Corpus of Permanent Funds SB 606
ANALYST: Eaton


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
$ 50.0 Non-Recurring General Fund



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



This bill makes an appropriation from the general fund to the State Investment Council for expenditure in FY02 for the purpose of obtaining a ruling from the IRS as to whether the corpus of the permanent funds can be used to guarantee GO bonds issued and not affect the tax-exempt status of these bonds.



Significant Issues



The IRS ruling, if favorable, may provide for higher ratings on some school districts GO bonds, lowering the costs of financing some school capital projects. Statewide, it is estimated that the program would save school districts $900,000 annual in interest expense.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



This is a one-time expenditure of $50.0 thousand from the general fund in FY02. Unexpended or unencumbered balances remaining at the end of FY02 would revert to the general fund.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



Minimal.



JBE/ar