NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Carraro DATE TYPED: 03/10/01 HB
SHORT TITLE: Limit Prescription Drug Prices to Providers SB 678
ANALYST: Valdes


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY01 FY02 FY01 FY02
NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)





SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Attorney General, General Services Department, Board of Pharmacy, State Agency on Aging, Department of Health



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



The Bill would prohibit the sale in New Mexico of prescription drugs at a price higher than the price for which the prescription drug is sold in a foreign country. Provides for treble damages, costs, and attorney fees for willful violation of the act.



Significant Issues



According to the Attorney General, it is questionable whether New Mexico has the authority to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. In PharMa v. Maine, United States District Court, district of Maine, Civil No. OO-157-B-H, the Court granted a request for a preliminary injunction to prevent the operation of a Maine program, which attempted to regulate the price of prescription drugs sold in Maine. The Court held that Maine had no authority to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. The Court, citing a long line of cases, noted that a state has no authority to regulate commerce that takes place outside of the State's borders, whether or not the commerce has effects within the State. The Court held that the practical effect of what Maine had done was to limit the revenue an out-of-state manufacturer can obtain when it sells prescription drugs to out-of-state distributors that ultimately send or bring the drugs to Maine. To the extent that this decision correctly states the law, this Bill would violate the interstate commerce clause of the United States Constitution.



General Services Department states the bill would require the state's Prescription Drug Manager (PBM) to sell or provide prescription drugs to the group health plan at a price that does not exceed the price the seller sold the same prescription drug to a drug distributor in a foreign country.



According to the Department of Health, in New Mexico, an estimated 24 percent of the population is uninsured and nearly as many are insured but are without prescription benefits. Many of these citizens without a prescription drug benefit are senior citizens. There is a significant lack of access and affordability of prescription drugs for many of New Mexico's citizens and senior citizens. Medicare reimbursement for insurance companies and health maintenance organization managed care providers is now nonexistent leaving many of New Mexico's citizens and senior citizens without prescription drug benefits. The monthly cost for senior citizens prescription drugs averages four hundred fifty dollars ($450) per month. Most senior citizens are on a fixed income and are unable to afford prescription drugs; some go without food and other essentials to buy drugs.



Many New Mexico citizens, especially those in the southern half of the state, travel to Mexico on a regular basis to obtain their prescription drugs at substantial savings. In Mexico, no prescription is required for drugs which would require a prescription in the United States, excluding controlled drugs, and quantities allowed across the border depend on who is the border inspector at the time of the inspection.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



According to General Services Department, there would be substantial savings in the state employees drug benefit plan unless the prescription drug manager increases the cost of prescriptions in foreign countries. As it is now, an employee on maintenance medication can go across the border to Mexico or Canada and purchase the same FDA approved drug at several times less than purchasing the same drug here in the US.



According to the State Agency on Aging, gross receipts tax revenues may be reduced by reduced prescription drug prices, however, lower prices might allow for increased sales



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



Several other bills have been introduced in the House and the Senate that would have the effect of limiting prescription drug prices in New Mexico. Those dealing with prescription drug prices include HB 300, SB 143, HB 301, SB 141, HB 302.



OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES



Entities in countries such as Canada and Mexico are able to purchase and resell pharmaceuticals at lower prices than similar entities in New Mexico. SB678 would disallow sales of pharmaceuticals in New Mexico at prices that were higher than those listed in foreign countries. A mechanism to track prices in both foreign countries and New Mexico would need to be established.

RAE/njw