[1] NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website. The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR:	Vigil		DATE TYPED:	01/27/02		HB	186
SHORT TITLE:		4^th Judicial DA Employees’ Salary Increase				SB
					ANALYST:		Belmares

APPROPRIATION

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

$94.2

Recurring

General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Duplicates SB 182

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

House Bill 186 appropriates $94.2 from the general fund to the Fourth Judicial District Attorney to pay for a salary increase for employees in FY03. HB186 would provide a salary increase for all Fourth Judicial District Attorney’s office employees, contingent upon job performance.

Significant Issues

As part of its FY03 budget request, the Fourth Judicial Attorney requested $94.2 from the general fund to pay for a salary increase for employees; however, neither the LFC nor the executive recommended funding the agency’s request.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The appropriation of $94.2 contained in HB 186 is a recurring expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY03 shall revert to the general fund.

DUPLICATION

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

HB 186 duplicates SB 182.

EB/ar