[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Miera

 

DATE TYPED:

01/30/02

 

HB

287

 

SHORT TITLE:

Limit Seniors Residential Property Valuation

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Gilbert

 

REVENUE

 

Estimated Revenue

Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

($0.1)           *See Narrative

Recurring

General Fund

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)

 

Relates to HJR7

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC Files

 

Response Received

Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 287 would modify eligibility requirements for the low-income property tax valuation freeze.  Under current statutes, single-family dwellings occupied by low-income individuals aged 65 and over are eligible for the valuation freeze. The proposed measure would allow individuals owning and occupying multifamily dwellings to also qualify for the assessed value limitation.

 

     Significant Issues

 

According to the Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD), individuals (meeting the age and income requirements) who own high value duplexes or apartment complexes would appear to qualify for the freeze. As the measure is written, the value limitation applies to the entire property.

 

 

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

By freezing values of some properties, this bill would shift the property tax burden to individuals who do not qualify for the freeze. The number of individuals likely to qualify for the limitation would probably be small since the legislation requires individuals to own and occupy residential property, as well as satisfy low-income and age requirements.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACT

 

Counties would experience some increase in workloads, but these would be minor since the mechanisms for implementing the freeze have already been implemented.

 

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

 

If the intent of this bill is to assist low-income senior citizens, how can renters also be aided?

 

RLG/ar


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.