[1] NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.

 

Only the most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC’s office in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Pinto

 

DATE TYPED:

02/07/02

 

HB

 

 

SHORT TITLE:

Widen US Highway 666

 

SB

SJM 71

 

 

ANALYST:

Valdes

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY02

FY03

FY02

FY03

 

 

 

 

 

$80,000.0

Non-recurring

State Road Fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

State Highway and Transportation Department

LFC Files

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

Senate Joint Memorial 71 requests the State Highway Commission to designate widening of United States Highway 666 (US666) to four lanes a top project priority.

 

     Significant Issues

 

US666 is one of the most dangerous highways in the state.  When comparing US666 to nine other major highways in the state including US84/285 Santa Fe to Pojoaque and US70 Ruidoso to Riverside, over a five-year period from 1996 through 2000, US666 had the highest average number of traffic accidents annually which amounted to 135.  US666 also had the highest average number of people killed (9) and injured (130) per year, when compared to the other nine highways, over a five-year period.

 

US666 has been widened to four lanes from Gallup to Sheep Springs.  Widening the remaining 60 miles between Sheep Springs and the Colorado border would cost approximately $80 million.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The department is experiencing budget constraints with state road fund revenue projections flat and large declines expected in federal revenues, based on the proposed federal budget for fiscal year 2003 released by President Bush.  Any funding proposed for new projects would require a diversion of an equivalent amount of funding from existing highway projects or new revenue sources would have to be identified.

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

According to SHTD, the Navajo Nation can petition Congress for a congressional apportionment or propose a series of widening projects through the regional planning process as possible alternative funding sources.

 

MV/sb


 [1]Begin typing on the * in replace mode.  Do not add or delete spaces.