NOTE:  As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended only for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used for other purposes.

 

The most recent FIR version (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) is available on the Legislative Website.  The Adobe PDF version includes all attachments, whereas the HTML version does not.  Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

 

 

F I S C A L   I M P A C T   R E P O R T

 

 

 

SPONSOR:

Ponce

 

DATE TYPED:

2/11/03

 

HB

306

 

SHORT TITLE:

Investments by County and Municipal Treasurers

 

SB

 

 

 

ANALYST:

Padilla

 

APPROPRIATION

 

Appropriation Contained

Estimated Additional Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY03

FY04

FY03

FY04

 

 

 

$.01  See Narrative

 

 

Recurring

Local Governments

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

 

Duplicates SB 41 and HB 118, “Local Government Investments”

Relates to HB 93 and SB 40, “Local Government Permanent Funds”

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

LFC Files

 

Responses Received From

Department of Finance and Administration

 

SUMMARY

 

     Synopsis of Bill

 

House Bill 306 amends NMSA 1978, § 6-10-10, Section 1(F)(2) to allow county and municipal treasurers to invest in securities of agencies sponsored by the federal government.  Existing law restricts such investments to securities of agencies guaranteed by the federal government. 

 

     Significant Issues

 

Allowing counties and municipalities to invest in securities of agencies sponsored by the federal government versus guaranteed by the federal government will significantly increase their investment options.  For example, this bill would allows investments in Federal Home Loan Bank bonds and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae securities.  These securities typically have better yields than securities guaranteed by the federal government.

 

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

 

This bill may have a positive impact on local government revenues if local entities shift their portfolios to higher-yielding investments.

 

DUPLICATION AND RELATIONSHIP

 

This bill duplicates HB 118 and SB 41.  It relates to HB 93 and SB 40, which relate to creation and investment of local government permanent funds.

 

OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES

 

Although the U.S. Government does not guarantee the new investment options allowed by this bill, they are all AA or AAA rated securities.  Although these securities are quite sound, local governments will be accepting slightly more credit risk.  However, they will also be gaining the flexibility to obtain higher investment yields.

 

LP/yr