Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Fox-Young
DATE TYPED 1/25/05
HB 26
SHORT TITLE Additional Voting System Testing
SB
ANALYST Medina
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to the Election Code
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Secretary of State
Responses Received From
Secretary of State
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 26 amends the Election Code with a provision to allow for the testing of voting sys-
tems by an independent technician prior to the certification of voting systems for use in an elec-
tion. Under House Bill 26, county and state political party chairpersons may request an inde-
pendent test and the county clerk is required to comply with the request. The requested test could
be conducted up to three days prior to the county clerks’ testing and certification of voting sys-
tems for use in an election.
With respect to the manner of preparing voting machines, House Bill 26 also amends the Elec-
tion Code to require that, in addition to county party chairpersons and the Secretary of State, the
county clerks certify the type and serial number of each voting machine intended to be used in
each precinct by precinct number to all state political party chairpersons.
House Bill 26 also clarifies the requirement that all voting machine counters be tested for accu-
racy and that all voting machine counters be reset at zero immediately before the voting machine
pg_0002
House Bill 26 -- Page 2
is sealed.
Significant Issues
House Bill 26 does not specify how an independent technician would be selected to test the vot-
ing systems. If the independent technician is selected by a party chairperson and a different tech-
nician is the choice of another party chairperson, there exists the potential for conflict. Likewise,
if the Secretary of State is to select or approve of an independent technician, the independent
testing would cease to be purely independent.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The bill does not contain provisions for the qualifications of the independent technician or the
independent technician’s certification in the operation, testing and use of voting machine sys-
tems.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to the Secretary of State:
“As articulated in Section 1-9-2 NMSA 1978:
(1)
The Secretary of State is prohibited by law from using voting machine sys-
tems that do not meet federal elections standards, conform to state technology
rules, standards and practices and be tested by an independent authority.
(2)
Upon receipt of the report from the independent testing authority, the Secre-
tary of State shall examine the system. As part of the examination the Secre-
tary of State shall require the system to be independently inspected by two
voting system experts and shall require from each of them a written report on
the results of their inspection.
What if an “independent technician” disables a voting machine system three days before
a county technician is to certify the system.
In many precincts, it may be in the best interest of a party chairperson to hire an inde-
pendent technician to disable a voting machine system shortly before county certification
enabling the ability for sabotage and subjective tampering to stall, if not omit the use of
the machine in the election.”
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
The use of existing practices and procedures will continue.
DXM/rs:lg