Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lundstrom
DATE TYPED 3/6/05
HB 67/aHEC
SHORT TITLE Branch Community College Board Authority
SB
ANALYST Williams
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
New Mexico Association of Community Colleges (NMACC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HEC Amendment
The amendment provides for community college boards to participate in the selection process of
branch community college directors. The amendment removes the reference to “elected” to ad-
dress the existence of appointed board members. Searches for community college directors
would be conducted jointly by the board of regents at the parent institution and the community
college board. Selection of the director would be made by the board of regents, after consulta-
tion with the local board.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 67 expands existing statute to require joint selection of a branch community college
director by the board of a branch community college and the board of regents of the parent insti-
tution. Both bodies must consent to the appointment. The new requirement would not apply to
existing agreements or contracts entered into prior to the date of enactment of the bill.
Significant Issues
NMACC notes inconsistency in the current provisions of written operating agreements with re-
spect to appointment of the executive director. The provisions of this proposed statutory change
pg_0002
House Bill 67/aHEC -- Page 2
are already practiced in four branch campus agreements reviewed, but not in two others. An-
other campus reported that there was no current operating agreement.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill has no fiscal impact.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Would consent of both bodies be required to dismiss a branch community college director.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
CHE indicates:
The board and board of regents of the parent institution shall enter into a written agreement with:
(1) the higher education institution to have full authority and responsibility in relation to all aca-
demic matters; (2) the higher education institution to honor all credits earned by students as
though they were earned on the parent campus; (3) the course of study and program offered; (4)
the cooperative use of physical facilities and teaching staff; (5) consideration of applications of
local qualified people before employing teachers of the local school system; and (6) the detailed
agreement of financing and financial control of the branch community college.
The agreement shall be binding upon both the board of the branch community college and the
board of the parent institution; however it may be terminated by mutual consent or it may be
terminated by either board upon six months’ notice. If the branch college has outstanding gen-
eral obligation or revenue bonds, neither the board nor the board of regents may terminate the
agreement until the outstanding bonds are retired.
AW/yr:rs