Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR HJC
DATE TYPED 3/17/05
HB 356 & 578/HJCS
SHORT TITLE Employee Leave for Certain Crime Victims
SB
ANALYST Wilson
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
$0.1 Recurring
GF
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The House Judiciary Committee substitute for House Bill 356 and House Bill 578 requires em-
ployers to provide paid or unpaid leave to an employee who is a crime victim to attend any judi-
cial proceeding that relates to a crime committed against the victim.
An employer may require that a request for leave supported by satisfactory evidence The em-
ployee shall provide, in a timely manner, satisfactory evidence to the employer.
The bill defines the following:
Crime victim means a person against whom a criminal offense is committed, a family
member or a victim's representative when the crime victim is a minor, incompetent or a
homicide victim;
Employer means any person employing four or more persons and any person acting for
an employer.
Satisfactory evidence includes any police, court or official records or reports concerning
a crime committed against the victim.
The effective date of the provisions of this act is July 1, 2005.
pg_0002
House Bill 356 & 578/HJCS -- Page 2
Significant Issues
This substitute does not require employers to grant the same leave protections to witnesses of
crimes. Witnesses are usually issued subpoenas and required to attend judicial proceedings. The
Attorney General’s Office suggests that this bill should extend the same leave policy to witnesses
as well as victims of crime.
This bill does not provide any penalties for violating its provisions nor does it designate a re-
sponsible party for the enforcement of the legislation.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution, and documenta-
tion of statutory changes. Any additional fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional to
the enforcement of this law and commenced prosecutions. New laws, amendments to existing
laws, and new hearings have the potential to increase caseloads in the courts, thus requiring addi-
tional resources to handle the increase.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Public employers should be able to manage the requirements in this bill with proper planning.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
This bill defines “employer” as any person employing fouror more employees at any one time.
Is that based on presumed cost considerations. Should an employer with less than four employ-
ees have to comply with this provision.
DW/lg:rs