Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Gonzales
DATE TYPED 3/17/05
HB 392/aHBIC
SHORT TITLE Amend Continuing Care Act Disclosures
SB
ANALYST Hanika-Ortiz
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Aging and Long Term Services Department (ALTSD)
Office of the Attorney General (AGO)
Department of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HBIC Amendment
The House Business and Industry Committee amendment addresses ALTSD’s concerns by clari-
fying that a trust is to be held for the benefit of a resident until the resident has occupied the unit
or the resident’s contract cancellation period has ended.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 392 amends sections of the Continuing Care Act. The bill adds language that defines
the continuing care contract as one that requires entrance, advance fees or periodic fees. These
fees do not include security or damage deposit fees that amount to three months service or peri-
odic fees.
The AGO reports on the amended language of the required disclosure statement:
(A)
Language mandating any advertising stating that the continuing care community
(CCC) is serviced by or in close physical proximity to a hospital implied an
agreement to furnish nursing or acute care has been removed.
pg_0002
House Bill 392/aHBIC -- Page 2
(B)
Language that required a financial statement and audited report of the last fiscal
year prepared according to GAAP, prepared by a CPA including a cash flow
statement and a balance sheet, has been amended to require an audited financial
statement or a copy of previous year’s tax filings with the IRS.
(C)
The requirement to produce a financial statement to residents on an annual basis
is amended to mirror the language required in subsection (B).
(D)
24-17-5 (8) Contract information is amended to require that all deposits or en-
trance fees be held in trust in a federally insured NM bank until the resident oc-
cupies his unit or the contract cancellation period has ended.
(E)
24-17-5 (11) ALTSD must define reasonable return on investment and cost of
care.
(F)
24-17-16 Escrow requirements are amended to mirror the language of 24-17-5.
(G)
24-17-8 Consumer’s Guide to Continuing Care is amended to remove mandatory
language that the AGO and ALTSD will publish and distribute a consumer’s
guide to continuing care, and now is permissive language that AGO and ALTSD
may publish such a guide.
This bill also makes non-substantive grammatical changes.
Significant Issues
ALTSD has the following comment:
CCCs are retirement facilities that furnish pursuant to a contract, independent living and
health or health-related services. These services may be provided in the community, in
the resident’s independent living unit or in another setting, designated by the continuing
care contract, and include, at a minimum, priority access to a nursing facility or hospital
either on site or at a site designated by the contract. In other words, a CCC offers a resi-
dent the ability to “age in place” – from independent living through nursing home care.
Generally, but not always, the prospective resident pays a large up-front entrance fee.
There are also monthly fees for rent and a variety of other services.
While the Continuing Care Act falls far short of protecting residents against financially
unstable providers or ones that make excessive profit, at least the Act requires full disclo-
sure and reasonable fee increases. It is important to residents to know the financial status
of the CCC since they have likely invested a large portion, if not all, their life savings in
entrance and other fees and may not have the financial resources to move elsewhere.
Also, their intent in entering such an arrangement is the security of knowing they will not
have to move out of their “community” if and when they require assisted living or nurs-
ing home care.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
No Fiscal Impact
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The ALTSD reports HB392 represents a compromise that has been reached between ALTSD and
CCC representatives over amendments to the Continuing Care Act that had been proposed by
pg_0003
House Bill 392/aHBIC -- Page 3
CCC representatives.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The AGO has the following comment:
The proposed amendments are generally not substantive and most simplify the language
of the act without removing any consumer protections. However, the removal of the lan-
guage contained in 24-17-4 will apparently permit advertising that CCCs are located near
nursing facilities without implying that the agency actually provides the care. This ap-
pears to be a reduction in consumer protection.
AMENDMENT is proposed by the ALTSD on page 10, line 3, and on page 15, line 19, to add
the words “for the benefit of the resident” between the words “in trust…” and “…in a”. ALTSD
believes the additional language should help clarify the meaning of the two provisions.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL.
The Continuing Care Act will remain unchanged.
AHO/yr:lg