Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Papen
DATE TYPED 2/17/05
HB
SHORT TITLE NMFA Economic Development Loans
SB 477/aSCORC/aSJC
ANALYST Kehoe
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
NFI
(See Fiscal Im-
pact Narrative)
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA)
Economic Development Department (EDD)
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
The Senate Judiciary Committee amendments propose the following:
Item 1, strikes Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee amendments 24 and
25 relating to confidentiality of proprietary technical or business information and makes a
technical adjustment. SJC reinstates a stronger provision providing for penalties for
breach of confidentiality.
Items 2 and 3, require the trust indenture securing the economic development revolving
fund bonds to contain reasonable provisions for protecting and enforcing the rights and
remedies of bondholders, the duties of NMFA to exercise its powers and custody, and the
use and investment of money; requires NMFA to provide by the trust indenture for the
payment of the proceeds of the economic development revolving fund bonds and the
revenue to the trustee under the trust indenture or other depository for disbursement with
safeguards as determined by NMFA.
Items 4 and 5, are technical changes clarifying “bonds” as “economic development fund
bonds”.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 477/aSCORC/aSJC -- Page 2
Item 6 inserts two new sections.
1.
The first section requires confidentiality of proprietary technical or business in-
formation relative to the relocation or expansion of a business and exempts such
information from the Inspection of Public Records Act; makes it unlawful for any
employee of EDD, NMFA or any former employee of either agency to disclose
such information, except in response to a district, appellate or federal court order;
and provides that any such person revealing such information may be guilty of a
misdemeanor and may be sentenced accordingly.
2.
The second section adds a provision stipulating the Statewide Economic Devel-
opment Finance Act is an additional and alternative method for financing projects
and is intended to be supplemental and additional to powers conferred by other
laws.
Item 7 is a technical numbering adjustment.
Synopsis of SCORC Amendment
The Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee amendments propose the following:
Provides that all projects, whether “standard projects” or “state projects,” require statu-
tory authority prior to receiving financial assistance from the economic development re-
volving fund.
Expands the definition of “quantifiable benefits” to include those benefits which the bor-
rower by contract agrees to provide including: “local hiring quotas, job training com-
mitments and installation of public facilities or infrastructure”.
Requires that rules of the authority relating to “state projects” include provisions to en-
sure achievement of the economic development goals of the state project and that de-
scribe the specific means of recovering public money or other public resources if an eli-
gible entity defaults on its obligations to the authority.
Exempts proprietary technical or business information obtained by the New Mexico Fi-
nance Authority (NMFA) or the Economic Development Department (EDD) from the In-
spection of Public Records Act and requires both NMFA and EDD to treat such informa-
tion as confidential.
Adds a provision stipulating the Statewide Economic Development Finance Act provides
an additional and alternative method for financing projects and is intended to be supple-
mental and additional to powers conferred by other laws.
Exempts proprietary technical or business information obtained by the New Mexico Fi-
nance Authority (NMFA) or the Economic Development Department (EDD) from the In-
spection of Public Records Act and requires both NMFA and EDD to treat such informa-
tion as confidential.
Makes technical adjustments to the bill.
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 477, for the New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee, amends the Eco-
nomic Development Finance Act to authorize the New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA) to
issue bonds and make loans for economic development projects statewide; changes the name of
the economic development revolving fund; and amends and repeals certain sections of the Act.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 477/aSCORC/aSJC -- Page 3
Significant Issues
The 2003 Legislature enacted the Statewide Economic Development Finance Act providing for
creation of an economic development finance program and authorized NMFA to issue certain
economic development bonds, to purchase participation loans and make guarantees on behalf of
entities engaged in qualifying economic development projects. The Act further allowed NMFA
to issue tax exempt private activity bonds on behalf of small manufacturers and industrial reve-
nue bonds. However, no funding mechanism was established for the program.
Senate Bill 477 provides the methodology and mechanics to implement the purposes of the Eco-
nomic Development Act in accordance with Article 9, Subsection D of Section 14 of the Consti-
tution of New Mexico. Article 9 of the Constitutions allows the state or a county or municipality
to create new job opportunities by providing land, buildings or infrastructure for facilities to sup-
port new or expanding businesses if the assistance is granted pursuant to legislation approved by
a majority vote of those elected to each house of the legislature so long as the legislation must
include adequate safeguards to protect public money or other resources used for purposes of the
legislation.
Senate Bill 477 proposes planning and financing assistance to eligible entities to retain and ex-
pand existing businesses in the state, to encourage established businesses in other states to relo-
cate to New Mexico and to support new businesses in the state by providing for loans, loan par-
ticipations and loan guarantees from a proposed fund and establishes specific rules governing the
terms and conditions for loans.
The bill requires NMFA to adopt specific rules to implement the financial assistance program,
subject to approval of the New Mexico Finance Authority Oversight Committee, including estab-
lishing:
1.
Procedures for applying for financing assistance;
2.
Credit qualifications for eligible entities and establish terms and conditions for financing
assistance;
3.
Economic development goals for projects in consultation with EDD;
4.
Criteria for determining whether a project is to receive financing assistance as a standard
project or a state project;
5.
Methods for determining quantifiable benefits;
6.
Safeguards to protect public money and other public resources provided for a state pro-
ject; and
7.
Procedures for requests approved by law for state projects; and
8.
Fees to pay the costs of evaluating, originating and administering financing assistance.
Senate Bill 477 further proposes the following amendments and provisions to the Statewide Eco-
nomic Development Finance Act:
Repeals the current “statewide loan participation fund” and creates the “economic devel-
opment revolving fund” intended to provide the finance assistance.
Broadens the definition of “financing assistance” authorizing NMFA to issue project
revenue bonds, make, participate in and guarantee loans for economic development pro-
jects to or for eligible projects.
pg_0004
Senate Bill 477/aSCORC/aSJC -- Page 4
Authorizes NMFA to purchase participation loans from local banks for projects approved
for programmatic reasons by EDD, subject to rules promulgated by NMFA and approved
by the NMFA Legislative Oversight Committee. According to NMFA, these loans would
be made at a rate below the rate offered by a bank and would reduce the interest cost to
the borrower.
Stipulates that only NMFA may issue project revenue bonds on behalf of eligible entities.
Adds “not-for-profit” business enterprises to the list of eligible entities which currently
includes a for-profit business, including a corporation, a limited-liability company, part-
nership or other entity.
Creates the economic development revolving fund.
Requires “standard projects” be approved by NMFA pursuant to rules approved by the
NMFA Legislative Oversight Committee.
Expands the definition of “standard project” to include not only land, buildings and im-
provements, but also machinery and equipment, operating capital and other personal
property for which financing assistance is provided for adequate consideration, taking
into account the anticipated quantifiable benefits of the standard project. Standard pro-
jects would not require legislative approval, but only approval by NMFA, pursuant to
rules adopted by the NMFA Legislative Oversight Committee. However, the quantifiable
benefits of the standard project must yield a sufficient return to the state in order not to
violate the anti-donation clause of the constitution.
Defines a “state project” as land, buildings or infrastructure for facilities to support new
or expanding eligible entities for which financing assistance is provided pursuant to the
provisions of the constitution, thereby requiring the project be approved by law.
Provides that financing assistance documents include provisions to ensure achievement of
the economic development goal of the state project pursuant to rules of NMFA describing
the specific means of recovering public money or other public resources if the recipient
defaults on a loan.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 477 does not contain an appropriation. However, in a press release dated December
17, 2004, the governor announced “Invest New Mexico” initiatives to build state infrastructure,
including a $35 million “Smart Money” initiative to be headed by the New Mexico Finance Au-
thority. According to the release, “by partnering with New Mexico banks, NMFA will leverage
access of up to $100 million in additional business capital” for the economic development initia-
tive. It is anticipated the proposed $35 million would initially capitalize the economic develop-
ment revolving fund. According to NMFA, the fund would allow over $90 million in loans to be
made over 10 years, based on the initial appropriation and generate an estimated $55 million in
private investment, create 2,769 direct and indirect jobs, and add more than $1 billion in total
wages over the next decade.
The increase in capital, provided an appropriation is approved to capitalize the proposed fund, is
expected to increase economic development, particularly in rural and underserved areas of the
state potentially making these areas more self-sufficient from a local tax revenue standpoint.
The ability to borrow could also make local entities less reliant on the state for capital outlay
funding assistance.
pg_0005
Senate Bill 477/aSCORC/aSJC -- Page 5
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 477 requires NMFA to administer the economic development revolving fund and will
rely on the underwriting expertise of banks during the loan origination process to ensure the in-
tegrity of the loans while the Economic Development Department (EDD) is required to coordi-
nate eligibility surveys, evaluations, recommendations, and other necessary documentation for
the purposes of recommending projects to NMFA for financing assistance. The bill allows EDD
to request staffing and other assistance from NMFA as necessary to carry out the provisions of
the bill.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Senate Bill 477 duplicates House Bill 518 in its entirety.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
For clarification purposes, the following amendment is proposed:
1.
On page 16, line 17, the word “approved” should be changed to “approval”.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to NMFA, Senate Bill 477 proposes a quantitative method to determine the economic
and fiscal impact of a loan weighted against the NMFA financing to ensure the state and local
governments get a sufficient return (jobs, wages, taxes, etc.) and to ensure NMFA loans are re-
paid.
NMFA indicates “New Mexico unlike most other states, lack state funding dedicated to provid-
ing gap financing for economic development projects and places New Mexico at a disadvantage
in growing existing businesses and attracting out-of-state prospects. The proposed provisions in
this bill seek to lessen the disadvantage by offering what many other states offer businesses and
qualified not-for-profit corporations.”
Analysis of this bill reveals the following additional points to consider while deliberating pro-
posed amendments to the Economic Development Act:
There appears to be no cap on state participation in project loans.
EDD is required to evaluate projects, but there is no requirement that these evaluations be
made public.
There is no requirement for regular reporting to NMFA, LFC or other oversight entity.
There is no “But For” requirement to limit state involvement in projects that would nor-
mally be financed by private sector without state participation.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
The State Investment Council (SIC) website notes that “New Mexico statutes allow for
investments in Corporate Bonds, Certificates of Deposit in New Mexico financial institu-
tions, New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority Bonds, Small Business Administration
pg_0006
Senate Bill 477/aSCORC/aSJC -- Page 6
and Farm and Home Administration Guarantees, as well as participations in real estate-
related business loans.” Does SB 477 duplicate SIC’s current investment authority, or
does the bill provide an alternative vehicle.
2.
As an economic development program rather than an investment program, will the loans
be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
3.
Could SIC funds be used to fund this initiative.
4.
Will the economic development fund proposed in this bill require future state appropria-
tions.
5.
Why should “state project” loans require legislative authority, but not “standard project”
loans.
6.
Given the additional responsibilities and duties specified within the bill, do NMFA and
EDD have the capacity to fulfill the expectations without new resources.
LMK/yr:njw:lg