Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Griego
DATE TYPED 2/18/05
HB
SHORT TITLE Extend Rural Job Tax Credit
SB 695
ANALYST Taylor
REVENUE
Estimated Revenue
Subsequent
Years Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
($225.0)
Similar
Recurring
General Fund
($75.0)
Similar
Recurring Local Government
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HB 53
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Economic Development Department (EDD)
SUMMARY
Senate Bill 695 makes the rural job tax credit permanent. Under current law this credit would
sunset as of June 30, 2005.
The rural job tax credit is available to qualifying employers located in rural New Mexico. Rural
New Mexico is defined by exception. Excepted are Los Alamos County and incorporated mu-
nicipalities within a metropolitan statistical area with a population of 30 thousand or more. A
qualifying employer is one who has been approved by EDD for participation in the in-plant-
training program. The value of the credit is equal to 6.25 percent of the first $16 thousand in
wages paid for a qualifying job, where a qualifying job is also determined by qualification for in-
plant-training and has been held for at least 48 weeks in a 12 month period. The employer may
take the credit for 4 years in “tier one areas”, which is defined as municipalities in a rural area
with a population lower than 15 thousand or any other part of a rural area that is not located
within municipal boundaries. Employers may take the credit or two years in “tier two areas”,
which is defined as municipalities in a rural area with a population greater than 15 thousand. The
Economic Development, Taxation and Revenue, and the Department of Labor are required to
annually evaluate the effectiveness of rural job tax credit in stimulating rural economic develop-
pg_0002
Senate Bill 695 -- Page 2
ment and to report their findings to each session of the legislature as long as the credit is in ef-
fect.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
EDD reports three businesses—Southwest Cheese in Clovis, Monarch Litho in Santa Teresa and
Merrillat Industries in Los Lunas—have announced decisions to locate in New Mexico. They
claim the rural jobs tax credit was part of their location decision.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD estimates that fiscal impact of extending the credit is approximately $300 thousand. $225
thousand of this impacts the state general fund, and the rest represents revenue losses to local
government funds. The estimate is simply an average of the $900 thousand of credits taken over
the last three years. TRD explains that there is a local government impact despite provisions that
the credit does not apply to local option gross receipts taxes. This is because the credit does ap-
ply to the revenue the state shares with local government out of the 5 percent state gross receipts
tax.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The law requires that an evaluation of the credits effectiveness be presented to the legislature
every session the credit is in effect. The report is supposed to be jointly prepared by the Depart-
ments of Labor, the Taxation and Revenue Department and the Economic Development. To
date, no such report has been prepared. Discussion with Taxation and Revenue indicates that
both the timing (session time) and the requirement for a joint-report make satisfying this re-
quirement difficult. Perhaps, the current requirement should be amended to require the report to
be delivered to interim committees, say the Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Committee and
the Legislative Finance Committee.
Given the uncertainty associated with the fiscal impacts of this legislation, perhaps a new sunset
should be applied. Alternatively, the value of the credits could be capped.
BT/lg