Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Boitano
DATE TYPED 02/11/05 HB
SHORT TITLE No Scholarships for Remedial Courses
SB 707
ANALYST Williams
APPROPRIATION
Appropriation Contained Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY05
FY06
FY05
FY06
Indeterminate due to lack
of data on underlying
eligibles
Recurring
Lottery Tuition
Scholarship
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to various student financial aid bills
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
New Mexico Lottery Authority
No Response Received From Commission on Higher Education
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 707 would exclude students at four-year public post-secondary institutions from re-
ceiving lottery tuition scholarships during a semester in which they enroll in at least one remedial
course. As well, students at two-year community colleges would not be eligible for lottery tui-
tion scholarships for semesters during which they take two or more remedial courses.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Given no data on the underlying base of students meeting the criteria specified in this bill, the
fiscal impact of this bill is indeterminant at this time.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 707 -- Page 2
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Does the term remedial course need to be defined in each section of statute.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
How many impacted students currently attend four-year and two-year public, post-
secondary institutions.
2.
Would student behavior with respect to enrolling in remedial courses change as a result
of this legislation.
3.
What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of this proposal.
4.
What are the implications for the educational pipeline.
AW/sb