Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Moore
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1-20-06
HB 75
SHORT TITLE Quay and Union County Kidney Dialysis Units
SB
ANALYST Collard
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
$400.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
House Bill 75 appropriates $400 thousand from the general fund to the Department of Health for
the purpose of funding kidney dialysis units in Quay and Union counties.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $400 thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general
fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY07 shall revert to the
general fund.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
DOH indicates this bill attempts to address a need for dialysis patients in Quay and Union coun-
ties who currently have to travel 85 or more miles 2-3 times per week to urban centers in New
Mexico or Texas to receive appropriate treatment.
HPC research indicates the following about end state renal disease: according to DOH, approxi-
mately 1 in 11 adults in New Mexico has diabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage
pg_0002
House Bill 75 – Page
2
renal disease (ESRD), or kidney failure. In 2004, diabetes accounted for about 60 percent of
new cases of ESRD. There were 354 new cases of ESRD among New Mexicans with diabetes.
A total of 1,358 patients with diabetes were in dialysis.
Regarding lack of kidney dialysis units, HPC notes due to the lack of kidney dialysis units cer-
tain residents of Quay and Union counties who require kidney dialysis must travel far distances
in order to receive treatment. There are approximately eight persons from Union County who
require kidney dialysis and must travel in order to receive treatment. The number of persons
from Quay County who require kidney dialysis and must travel to receive treatment is not avail-
able at this time.
Possible barriers to new kidney dialysis units, according to HPC, are certain dialysis equipment,
such as a dialysis machine, is needed to perform kidney dialysis, and persons with the necessary
skills to operate the equipment are needed. Certain qualifications are required of technicians per-
forming kidney dialysis. There may be a lack of persons qualified to perform kidney dialysis in
Quay and Union counties.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
DOH notes there may be administrative implications associated with procurement and state li-
censing and regulation. There would be administrative implications associated with the need for
specially trained staff and a clinic site designated for each of the units.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1)
Does the equipment needed to carry out the provisions of this bill currently exist.
2)
Is the funding intended for capital outlay purchases or is it intended for operational
expenses, i.e – salaries, travel, etc.
3)
Will DOH require additional FTE to carry out the provisions of this bill.
KBC/mt