Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Papen
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1-24-06
HB
SHORT TITLE Water Rights Adjudications
SB 80
ANALYST Woods
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
$100,000.0
Non-Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the State Engineer- Interstate Stream Commission (OSE)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 80, which makes an appropriation for water rights adjudications, seeks to appropriate
$100,000,000 from the general fund to the Office of the State Engineer for expenditure in fiscal
years 2006 and 2007 to pay the costs of water rights adjudications. Any unexpended or unen-
cumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2007 shall revert to the general fund. This
legislation includes emergency language.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
OSE indicates that the only significant issue with SB80 is that it provides for reversion of any
remaining unencumbered or unexpended balance of the appropriated funds after only two years.
Two years is not enough time to responsibly expend $100,000,000.00. Accordingly, OSE sug-
gests the bill be amended to distribute the appropriated money into two existing funds, and
should not revert after any fiscal year. The proposed OSE amendment is included below [See
Amendments Section].
DFA notes that OSE is the lead agency in a number of adjudications regarding water rights from
interstate disputes to intrastate water right determination challenges between parties ranging
pg_0002
Senate Bill 80 – Page
2
from individual water right claimants to the Indian nations and agencies of the federal govern-
ment. Further, that this appropriation would appear to allow the agency to allocate these funds
toward any of these efforts. Combined, DFA observes, the water adjudication efforts that the
agency is involved in are expected to require hundreds of millions of dollars to complete.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
OSE indicates that the current operating budget in the state engineer’s litigation and adjudication
program is $6,713,000 for recurring expenses in adjudicating water rights in New Mexico. In
order to spend the appropriation of this bill in two years, the program will have to expand its ex-
penditures by a factor of 8 for each year. Since it is very unlikely that even after this massive
expenditure all the state’s water rights will have been completely adjudicated by the end of a two
year period, the state engineer would then have to scale back adjudication operations from the
level supported by the $100 million to the level supported by the current operating budget.
DFA observes that, depending upon the adjudication activities selected to be funded, some ac-
tivities may not be able to use millions of dollars of appropriations within two years. It is
questionable as to whether OSE could administer or utilize one hundred million dollars within
the appropriation period even if the appropriation was spread among a number of efforts and
utilized contractual services where appropriate. Further, because of the length of time involved in
many of OSE's adjudications, OSE has in the past had to extend special appropriations of several
million dollars for several consecutive years.
DFA further suggests that, although the $100,000.000 is a non-recurring general fund appropria-
tion, depending on which adjudication activities this appropriation were to fund, it is possible
that it may attract federal matching funds
AMENDMENTS
OSE suggests the following amendment:
Section 1. APPROPRIATION. — One hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) is ap-
propriated from the general fund to the funds identified below in the following
amounts for expenditure by the state engineer to support the state’s prosecution of
stream system adjudications and completion of hydrographic surveys, consistent with
the purposes of the funds identified below:
A. Fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) is appropriated from the general fund to irriga-
tion works construction fund, established pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 72-14-23 (1959),
and any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of a fiscal year
shall not revert to the general fund; and
B. Fifty million dollars ($50,000,000) is appropriated from the general fund to the im-
provement of Rio Grande income fund, established pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 19-1-
17(B)(36) (2005), and any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end
of a fiscal year shall not revert to the general fund.
BW/mt