Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Rodriquez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1-29-06
HB
SHORT TITLE
DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT
CENTER
SB 204
ANALYST Lucero
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY06
FY07
$50.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates HB376,
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico State University (NMSU)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The bill appropriates fifty thousand dollars ($50.0) to CYFD for expenditure in 2007 to establish
a technical assistance resource center to support the disproportionate minority contact task force.
The disproportionate minority contact task force is supervised by the juvenile justice advisory
committee (JJAC). The technical assistance resource center shall involve the school of social
work at:
1.
New Mexico Highlands Univeristy
2.
New Mexico State University
3.
University of New Mexico
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $50.0 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 204 – Page
2
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of 2007 shall revert to the gen-
eral fund.
This appropriation was not included in the department’s budget request; however the operating
budget does contain federal funds for JJAC of which $50.0 is for disproportion minority contact
studies. This appropriation was not part of the executive recommendation.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
NMSU provides the following statement:
This minimal amount of funding would help in measuring the prevalence of the problem in New
Mexico and assist in pulling together a compendium of “best practices” nation-wide that could
then be made available to agencies in New Mexico. It would most likely be insufficient in
amount to address implementation of any intervention efforts.
The proposed Center would involve the two Schools of Social Work within the State: New Mex-
ico State University and Highlands University (there is no School of Social Work at the Univer-
sity of New Mexico, but perhaps a related social science program could nonetheless participate).
There is also a social work baccalaureate degree program at Western NM University, but that
program is not mentioned in the bill.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
There is no administrative appropriation to CYFD or JJAC to administer the technical assistance
resource center.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
SB204 relates to the General Appropriation Act which appropriates federal funds to Juvenile Jus-
tice Advisory Committee. HAFC has recommended language to ensure $50.0 federal funds con-
tinue to be transferred to JJAC for disproportional minority contact studies.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
UNM does not have a school of social work.
CYFD provided the following statement:
The bill cites the Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee (JJAC) as supervising the Disproportion-
ate Minority Contact task force. The JJAC coordinates with the task force which reports directly
to the Cabinet Secretary.
Funds will be used to follow the Behavioral Health Collaborative model for encouraging joint
research at New Mexico institutions of higher education.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
From: A Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) Chronology. by Heidi Hsia, DMC Coordina-
tor, State Relations and Assistance Division, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preven-
tion
pg_0003
Senate Bill 204 – Page
3
Disproportional minority contact (DMC) “was brought to national attention by the Coalition for
Juvenile Justice (formerly the National Coalition of State Juvenile Justice Advisory Groups) in
its 1988 annual report to Congress, A Delicate Balance. In the 1988 Amendments to the Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention (JJDP) Act of 1974, Congress required that States address
DMC in their State plans. Specifically, under the Formula Grants Program, each State must ad-
dress efforts to reduce the proportion of youth detained or confined in secure detention facilities,
secure correctional facilities, jails, and lockups who are members of minority groups if it exceeds
the proportion of the general population. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
(OJJDP) has defined minority populations as African Americans, American Indians, Asians, Pa-
cific Islanders, and Hispanics.”
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The disproportionate representation of minority youth in the juvenile justice system would con-
tinue to be an unexplored issue, lacking even baseline information on the rates for this concern.
DL/nt