Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Stewart
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/23/2007
3/12/2007 HB 35/aHEC/aHAFC
SHORT TITLE School Principal Salary Calculation Changes
SB
ANALYST Aguilar
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
** NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
** LESC analysis received 3/12/2007 indicates that appropriations contained in House Bill
2 are sufficient to implement the provisions of this bill with no additional funding.
Duplicates Senate Bill 73
Duplicates appropriations contained in House Bill 2
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Education Department (PED)
Office of Educational Accountability (OEA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HAFC Amendment
The House Appropriations and Finance Committee amendment to House Bill 35 as amended
removes the appropriation.
Synopsis of HEC Amendment
The House Education Committee amendment to House Bill 35 adds language which includes as
part of principal evaluations a tie to student achievement and progress on the educational plan for
student success.
pg_0002
House Bill 35/aHEC/aHAFC – Page
2
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 35 appropriates $4.2 million from the general fund to the public school fund for
distribution through the state equalization guarantee to implement minimum salaries for
principals and assistant principals in the 2007-2008 school year.
House Bill 35 amends existing statute by:
Adding a definition of “responsibility factor" and assigning multipliers to be used in
determining salary minimums;
Providing that in order to receive a level 3-B (administrator) license a “teacher" rather
than an “instructional leader" must have held a level 3-A license for at least one year;
Removing school size and adding a responsibility factor as the criteria for determining
salary minimums for principals and assistant principals;
Providing that the $50,000 minimum salary for level 3-A teachers be used as the base for
applying the responsibility factor, and;
Requiring that by the beginning of the 2008-2009 school year, a uniform standard of
evaluation be implemented.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $4.2 million contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2008 shall revert
to the general fund.
Estimates made by LFC and LESC indicate that $4.2 million would be sufficient to implement
the minimums contained in the bill assuming no salary increases. As compensation
appropriations increase, this amount would decrease.
Existing statute, based on school size, would require approximately $750 thousand to implement
minimums.
The public school support recommendation from the executive does not recommend funding for
principals using a responsibility factor nor does it recommend minimum salaries for assistant
principals.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Since the implementation of the three-tier salary structure for teachers, concerns have been raised
that principal’s and assistant principals’ salaries were not keeping pace with increases in teacher
salaries and a number of administrators were returning to the classroom causing a shortfall in
available candidate pools. The Office of Educational Accountability notes that a number of
studies have identified school leadership as second only to teaching among school-related factors
that affect student achievement. Recent research by the OEA indicates a high turnover rate of
principals in the New Mexico schools in need of improvement and there is widespread concern
that fewer experienced educators will choose to become or remain principals if they can make as
much or more money by staying in the classroom.
House Bill 35 attempts to address these concerns by implementing an evaluation system for
pg_0003
House Bill 35/aHEC/aHAFC – Page
3
principals and by including a responsibility factor that ensures principals’ and assistant
principals’ minimum salaries are always higher than the highest proposed minimum salaries
($50,000) for Level 3 teachers.
The bill also replaces the term “instructional leader" with the word “teacher" as a technical
correction to statute. Under provisions of the Public School Code “instructional leader" is not
defined as an educational position.
Minimum salaries would be as follows:
Elementary School Principals, $60,000
Middle School Principals, $70,000
High School Principals, $80,000
Elementary School Assistant, $55,000
Middle School Assistant, $57,500
High School Assistant, $62,500
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
PED has indicated it will require as much as $400 thousand to develop the evaluation system yet
in testimony before LESC the department indicated it had utilized $150 thousand from the
Teacher Professional Development Fund and $60 thousand in funds received from the Wallace
Foundation to begin development of the system. It appears the agency is well on its way to
developing the evaluation system and may not require additional funding.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 35 duplicates Senate Bill 73 and relates to appropriations contained in House Bill 3.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Salary minimums currently in statute based on school size would take effect on July 1, 2007.
PA/nt:csd:mt