Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR HAFC
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/27/07
3/8/07 HB CS/CS/433/aHAFC
SHORT TITLE
Land, Wildlife & Clean Energy Act
SB
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
*NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
*See fiscal Implications Narrative
Relates to SB309
Duplicates appropriation in SB710 (Laws 2007, Chapter 2).
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Responses Received From (For original bill)
Energy Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
NM Environment Department (NMED)
Department of Game and Fish (DGF)
Department of Agriculture (NMSU)
Office of State Engineer (OSE)
State Land Office (SLO)
New Mexico Finance Authority (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HAFC Substitute and Amendment
The House Appropriations and Finance Committee substitute for House Bill 433 is very similar
to the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee substitute except for the financing
provisions. The HAFC substitute removes the Conservation and Clean Energy bonding fund and
all references to it as well as the appropriation of $10 million. The amended substitute changes
pg_0002
CS/CS/House Bill 433/aHAFC– Page
2
the language so that the Land, Wildlife and Clean Energy Bond Fund is subject to appropriation
and projects with costs greater than $2 million must be specifically authorized by the legislature.
The Land, Wildlife and Clean Energy board must report to the legislature and governor by
October 1
st
of each year.
HAFC substitute for House Bill 433 as amended creates the Land, Wildlife and Clean Energy
(LWCE) board to oversee projects that will conserve land and water and promote clean energy in
New Mexico. The LWCE will be administratively attached to the Energy, Minerals and Natural
Resources Department (EMNRD).
The LWCE board will be charged with soliciting, approving and certifying projects to be funded
using the following criteria:
Potential for conserving land or wildlife or increasing clean energy development;
Potential for leveraging other investments, public and/or private, including allowing local
governments to match funding by adopting open space and agricultural protection
policies;
Impacts of the project, including benefits of avoidance of waste;
Expertise of entity proposing projects;
Potential for collaboration among the state and other entities, including landowners;
Balance between conservation and clean energy development projects;
The LWCE board will be made up of fourteen members:
EMNRD secretary or designee
NM Department of Agriculture director or designee
Department of Game and Fish director or designee
State Engineer or designee
Ten public members
The ten public members are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the senate and they
each have to represent one of ten occupations, interests or activities listed:
Wind, solar and biomass
Energy conservation and efficiency
Farm production (member’s primary occupation)
Municipalities and counties
Land or natural area protection trust
Wildlife management and conservation
Tribal land conservation
Community land grants and acequias
Livestock or dairy (member’s primary occupation)
Hunting or fishing
There are additional criteria for conservation projects that include supporting private ownership
of working farms and ranches, assistance to private landowners in conservation, protection of
ecosystems or habitat, and improving public access for outdoor recreation-including hunting and
fishing. Clean energy project proposals should show how the project increases energy efficiency
or conservation and how the project uses solar, biomass, geothermal, hydrogen or wind power.
The bill specifically disallows use of eminent domain or condemnation for the purposes of
pg_0003
CS/CS/House Bill 433/aHAFC– Page
3
acquiring land or water rights (Section 6-A). Easements and access agreements may be acquired
if the owner voluntarily enters into an agreement to sell the land, water rights, or conservation
easement or enter into an access agreement. There are other property protections as well
including a requirement to compensate a local district if conservation project which the local
district is not a partner depletes the tax base. Mineral rights and access to land for mineral
severance are protected.
The LWCE board will have to report annually by October 1
st
to the legislature and the governor
on the projects, budget, and 5-year strategy. The report also must include information on how to
apply for funding and an evaluation of the social, economic and ecological impact of the
program.
The use of the funds to purchase water rights is designed to protect acequia and irrigation
associations as well as other water users. The LWCE board cannot buy water rights that are
above market value, are insufficiently senior, have not been adjudicated by the office of the state
engineer (OSE) and can be exported to a different basin.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
HAFC proposed substitute for House Bill 433 has no appropriation or distribution so no fiscal
impact. There is a $2,014,000 appropriation in SB710 which has been passed and signed (Laws
2007, Chapter 2).
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
There are already several programs in state and federal government to address conservation and
clean energy and it is unclear whether this is an additional program or it is meant to consolidate
other programs. EMNRD has a program for renewable energy. The Department of Game and
Fish has conservation and habitat programs. OSE manages the state water resources including
conservation and adjudication. Each of these programs would be able to apply for funding from
the LWCE board for projects that were not included in their annual budget. State Land Office
(SLO) reports that “most if not all of the contemplated projects and acquisitions have other
agencies and jurisdictions that presently operate in the same field e.g. the SLO is currently
involved in clean energy projects, habitat restoration, land management rehabilitation, watershed
maintenance and recreational activities. The potential for duplication of effort is significant."
OSE also feels that when the LCWE board becomes active in the water rights market, it will be
directly competing with the Interstate Stream Commission for the acquisition of water rights.
NMFA reports that the method of compensation for local governments who are not partnering on
a project is inadequately defined. The bill addresses the issue of compensation by requiring
compensation based on the use of the land at the time of purchase. Some uses, such as
agricultural, are treated differently for taxation and so determining the last use at time of
purchase may pose difficulties.
NMED reports that HB433 addresses some of the recommendations made by Governor
Richardson’s Climate Change Advisory Group including making New Mexico the “clean energy
state" and reducing New Mexico’s greenhouse gas emissions. The substitute also follows these
recommendations.
pg_0004
CS/CS/House Bill 433/aHAFC– Page
4
The NM Department of Agriculture reports that $20 million of federal funds are available for
matching programs for conservation that the state is not taking advantage of and there is over
$40 million in unmet conservation funding needs and another $10 million in unmet needs for
clean energy.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
SLO and NMED have noted that they are not included in the membership of the board.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
SLO notes that the staff and the executive director will need to have significant cross-discipline
skills in all of the areas contemplated by the bill.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Establishing the board and funds is part of the Executive budget recommendation.
SB 309 is an identical bill to the original but relies on a different financing method than the
HENRC substitute.
ALTERNATIVES
To address SLO concerns, the Commissioner of Public Lands could be added to the list of board
members or the board could be required to seek consultation from SLO when the land
acquisition affects lands held in the public trust and may impact income to the trust.
NF/nt