Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR

Herrera

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

1/29/07

HB 450

SHORT TITLE

6

th

Judicial District Restorative Justice

SB

ANALYST

C.Sanchez

APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

Appropriation

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY07

FY08

$0.0

$270.0

Recurring

General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Duplicates: SB 138, 6th Judicial District Restorative Justice

ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)

FY07

FY08

FY09 3 Year

Total Cost

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

Total

None Indeterminable Indeter-

minable Indeter-

minable Recurring General

Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

House Bill 450 provides for an appropriation of $270,000 from the general fund to the sixth judi-

cial district court for expenditure in FY 2008 to provide juvenile and adult offender restorative

justice services in the sixth judicial district, including mediation, community conferencing and

justice circles. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY 2008 shall

revert to the general fund.

House Bill 450 – Page

2

The Restorative Justice Program claims to provide the following benefits:

•

Victims are provided an opportunity to face the offender, ask questions only the offender

can answer, and express the impact of the crime on themselves and their family.

•

The community has a meaningful voice in the cause and effect of crime in their

neighborhoods.

•

Studies consistently show a reduction in repeat offenses by offenders after participating

in restorative justice. Offenders realize that it is about more than just breaking the law,

and that they have affected others. They are in turn supported in repairing the harm in a

meaningful way.

•

Participants indicate high satisfaction for the process.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The appropriation of $270,000 is to hire an employee (.5 FTE) to support this project. The re-

maining funds (contractual) will be used for the design and implementation of restorative justice

practices and research and evaluation to incorporate best practices and monitor and demonstrate

effectiveness. Community volunteers and donations will provide additional support.

The total amount of $270,000 is recurring expenses and increases the budget of the sixth judicial

district court. Any unexpended or unencumbered amount remaining at the end of the year shall

revert to the general fund.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

This bill will increase the 6

th

Judicial District’s Budget by 10 percent.

Duplicates:

SB 138, 6th Judicial District Restorative Justice

PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS

A portion of the funding will be used to evaluate the program, incorporate best practices and

monitor and demonstrate the effectiveness of the program.

WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL

Status quo.

POSSIBLE QUESTIONS

Would a smaller appropriation produce similar results.

CS/nt