Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Cote
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/12/07
HB 619/aHEC
SHORT TITLE Dona Ana Parent and Child Education Programs
SB
ANALYST Lucero
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$500.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to
HM 3 and SB 136; Duplicates SB 554
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD)
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HEC Amended Bill
House Education Committee amendment to House Bill 619 changed the agency receiving the
appropriation from CYFD to the local government division of the Department of Finance and
Administration. The amendment clarifies that the appropriation to contract for one program
rather than several programs in Dona Ana County for parent and child education. The
amendment specifies that the contractor shall provide:
parenting education that teaches parents to be the primary teacher and full partners in
their child's education;
early childhood education to prepare children for success in school and life;
adult literacy education that leads to economic self-sufficiency;
community resource awareness so that parents are able to help themselves;
home visits to provide one-to-one guidance on more effective parenting and home
teaching skills;
transportation and other support services that help the families participate on a consistent
pg_0002
House Bill 619/aHEC – Page
2
basis;
regular attendance of participating families".
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 619 appropriates five hundred thousand ($500,000) from the general fund to
Children, Youth and Families Department for expenditure in fiscal year 2008 for parent and
child education programs in Dona Ana county.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of five hundred thousand ($500,000) contained in this bill is a recurring
expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of
fiscal year 2008 shall revert to the general fund.
The appropriation in this bill was not part of Children Youth and Families Department's request
and is not included in the Executive recommendation for Children Youth and Families
Department.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The bill does not address any specific programs or approaches to parent and child education
programs.
There are some consistent components of successful programs that have been identified in
compiling information on parent and child education. Here are some that should be considered
prior to funding:
Parenting education that teaches parents to be the primary teacher and full partners in
their child’s education
Early childhood education to prepare children for success in school and life
Adult literacy education that leads to economic self-sufficiency
Community resource awareness so that parents are able to help themselves
Home visits to provide one-to-one guidance on more effective parenting and home
teaching skills
Transportation and other support services that help the families participate on a consistent
basis
Regular attendance of participating families.
Research has shown that student performance is enhanced when parents are actively involved
with the school in their child’s education. New research produced by the Southwest Educational
Development Laboratory’s National Center for Family and Community Connections with
Schools examines the impact of different family and community connections on student
achievement. (
http://www.sedl.org/connections/resources/readiness-synthesis.pdf
)
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
There is no specific PED performance measure; however, this bill could support the PED goal of
ensuring that all children are ready for kindergarten as well as supporting the Pre-K Initiative of
the Governor.
pg_0003
House Bill 619/aHEC – Page
3
Depending upon the age-group targeted, and the type of parent-child education provided, the bill
could positively impact a range of tasks and measures in the Governor’s policy initiative
“Making Schools Work" and more specifically: Ensure that all young children are ready for
school; Increase parents’ involvement in their children’s education; and Close the student
achievement gap by supporting the children and schools who need the most assistance.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
If passed, the bill will have a slight administrative impact on children, youth and families
department that the bill does not address.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Relates to
HM 3 and SB 136; Duplicates SB 554
TECHNICAL ISSUES
This bill only provides funds for programs in Dona Ana County. A statewide program focused
on rural areas would help break the State’s generational education gap.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of government profiled Kentucky’s statewide
program for Parents and Children:
(
http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/awards.html.id=3492
)
In 1985, 60 percent of the students in 52 Kentucky school districts were not graduating
from high school. Of people aged 25 or older in Kentucky, there was a 36 percent chance
that they had not graduated from high school and over half of those had less than a 9
th
grade education. Kentucky, at the time, led the nation with these appalling statistics. These
numbers indicated to the Kentucky legislature that there was a significant and inter-
generational problem in Kentucky's education system. Concluding the problem of illiteracy
and academic failure tends to be repeated generation after generation, the state government
created the Parent and Child Education Program (PACE) to intervene with both parents and
children in order to break this cycle of under-education.
Recognizing the current adult population's educational challenges and the potential
influence that early-childhood education programs can have on later success in school and
in life, PACE seeks to improve the education of both parents and pre-school age children
simultaneously. Run by 12 local school districts in cooperation with the Kentucky board of
education, the program focuses on families in rural communities.
The program's concept is simple: everyone goes to school. For example, on a typical day in
the program, parents and children arrive at school together. They have breakfast after
which the parents go to their adult education classes while the children go to their pre-
pg_0004
House Bill 619/aHEC – Page
4
school classrooms. After two and a half to three hours, the parents join the children in class
for joint activities designed to help the parents understand how their children learn and
what their role is in the learning process. The parents and children then go to lunch
together, after which the children take a nap while the parents attend programs designed to
help them to be effective parents, students, and citizens, and to help them make plans for
their academic and vocational future.
The program has had a significant impact. In its second year of existence, nearly 50 percent
of the 1,000 PACE participant parents had passed a General Educational Development test,
having a direct positive effect on Kentucky's current adult population. More importantly,
however, 82 percent of PACE participants reported attitude changes towards education in
general. It is through this change in attitude that Kentucky hopes to inspire ambition and
educational progress among its children. This ambition will ultimately break the
generational cycle of failure and improve the performance of Kentucky's youngest students.
ALTERNATIVES
Expand the program funding in this bill and pilot a statewide program.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Status Quo.
DL/nt