Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Sandoval
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/13/07
3/15/07 HB 638/aHBIC/aSFC
SHORT TITLE Health Care Provider Gross Receipts
SB
ANALYST Schardin/Francis
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
($72.0)
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
($19,871)
($29,390) Recurring General Fund
($3,388)
($4,160) Recurring
Local
Governments
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From:
Several agencies responded to the underlying bills that are related to
the provisions amended here.
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFC Amendment
Hearing and Vision Aid Dispenser Gross Receipts: The amendment creates a new gross
receipts tax deduction for receipts from the sale of vision and hearing aids or from fitting and
dispensing of these types of aids.
Vision aids are defined as closed circuit television systems, monoculars, magnification systems,
speech output devices or other systems specifically designed for use by persons with low vision
or visual impairment and not normally used by a person who does not have low vision or visual
pg_0002
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
2
impairment. Visual impairment is defined as a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better
eye with use of a correcting lens, or a limitation in the fields of vision so the widest diameter of
visual field subtends an angle of 20 degrees or less.
Hearing aids are defined as small electronic prescription devices that amplify sound and are
usually worn in or behind the ear of a person with impaired hearing. Hearing aids include
cochlear implants, amplification systems or other devices specifically designed for use by a
person with hearing loss and not normally used by a person who does not have hearing loss. The
effective date of these provisions will be July 1, 2007.
Hospital Gross Receipts Credit: The amendment creates a gross receipts tax credit for hospitals
licensed by the Department of Health (for-profit hospitals). The credit equals roughly 20 percent
of the state gross receipts tax rate in FY08, 40 percent in FY09, 60 percent in FY10, 80 percent
in FY11, and the entire state gross receipts tax rate in FY12 and beyond. The provision will be
applicable to tax reporting periods after July 1, 2007.
Indian Health Service Payment Gross Receipts: The amendment will allow receipts from
payments by or on behalf of the Indian Health Service (IHS) of the United States Department of
Health and Human Services for the provision of medical and other health services by medical
doctors and osteopathic physicians to be deducted from gross receipts. The effective date of
these provisions will be July 1, 2007.
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit: The amendment creates a phased-in gross
receipts tax credit that may be claimed by a medical doctor or licensed osteopathic physician for
the value of unpaid medical care services provided while on call to a hospital. In FY08, a
taxpayer’s credit amount will equal 33 percent of the value of those unpaid services. In FY09,
the credit will be equal to 67 percent of that value, and in FY10 and beyond, the credit will be for
the full value.
The value of qualified services will be the amount charged for the services and may not exceed
130 percent of the reimbursement rate for the services under the Medicaid program. To qualify
for the credit, medical services must remain unpaid after one year from the date of billing and
must meet the following criteria: the services must have been provided to a person without health
insurance or whose health insurance would not cover the services, who was not eligible for
Medicaid. The services must also not be reimbursable under a program established in the
Indigent Hospital and County Health Care Act (Chapter 27, Article 5 NMSA 1978). The
effective date of these provisions is July 1, 2007.
Rural Health Care Practitioner Tax Credit: The amendment provides a personal income tax
credit to health care practitioners who provide services in rural underserved areas. The credit
may be carried forward for three years if the credit exceeds tax liability. The maximum allowable
credit for physicians, dentists, osteopathic physicians, clinical psychologists, podiatrists and
optometrists is $5 thousand. The maximum allowable credit for dental hygienists, physician
assistants, certified nurse-midwives, certified registered nurse anesthetists, certified nurse
practitioners or clinical nurse specialists is $3 thousand.
To qualify for the full credit, a practitioner must have provided health care for 2,080 hours at a
practice site in an approved area. If the practitioner provided health care for at least 1,040 hours,
the practitioner is eligible for 50 percent of the credit.
pg_0003
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
3
The Department of Health will determine whether the practitioner’s application qualifies for the
credit and will issue a certificate to the Taxation and Revenue Department. The credit is effective
for tax years beginning with 2007.
Oxygen Delivery Gross Receipts: The amendment expands the gross receipts tax deduction for
prescription drugs created in Section 7-9-73.2 to include oxygen and oxygen services provided
by a licensed Medicare durable medical equipment provider. The effective date of this provision
will be July 1, 2007.
Tax Incentives for Certain Health Insurers: The provision amends sections of the Insurance
Code to provide an increased premium tax credit for health insurers who pay assessments to the
New Mexico Medical Insurance Pool (NMMIP). Currently, health insurers who pay these
assessments get a credit equal to 30% - 50% of the amount paid. The provision increases those
credits to 50% of the assessed amount for most members and 75% of the assessed amount
attributable to Pool policy holders that receive premiums through the federal Ryan White CARE
Act, the Ted R. Montoya hemophilia program at the University of New Mexico health sciences
center, the Children's Medical Services bureau of the Public Health Division of the Department
of Health or other programs receive state funding or assistance. The effective date of these
provisions is July 1, 2007.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Health Practitioner Deduction: House Bill 638 expands a gross receipts tax deduction for the
receipts of certain health care practitioners from third-party administrators of Medicare and the
federal TRICARE program to include receipts of doctors of social workers, oriental medicine,
athletic trainers, chiropractic physicians, counselor and therapist practitioners, dentists, massage
therapists, naprapaths, nurses, nutritionists, dieticians, occupational therapists, optometrists,
pharmacists, physical therapists, psychologists, radiologic technologists, respiratory care
practitioners, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists. The bill also provides definitions
of these fields of health care.
Clinical Laboratories: House Bill 638 also amends expands the list of health practitioners who
receive a gross receipts tax deduction for receipts from managed care providers, commercial
health insurers and Medicare part C to include accredited clinical laboratories that are not located
in a physician’s office or hospital. Clinical laboratories were not included in 2004 legislation that
made many other health provider receipts deductible from gross receipts tax. The effective date
of the provisions in this bill is July 1, 2007.
pg_0004
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
4
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Title
FY08 FY09 FY10
Indian Health Service Paym ent Gross Receipts
(72)
(76)
(79)
Recurring General Fund
Sub Total - Amendments
(72)
(76)
(79)
Recurring General Fund
Title
FY08 FY09 FY10
Hearing and Vision Aid Dispenser Gross Receipts
(740)
(780)
(815)
Recurring General Fund
(490)
(515)
(540)
Recurring
Local
Governments
Hospital Gross Receipts Credit
(3,040)
(6,640)
(10,950)
Recurring General Fund
Indian Health Service Payment Gross Receipts
(188)
(197)
(207)
Recurring General Fund
(125)
(131)
(138)
Recurring
Local
Governments
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit
(800)
(1,770)
(1,894)
Recurring General Fund
(550)
(1,180)
(1,263)
Recurring
Local
Governments
Rural Health Care Practitioner Tax Credit
(3,400)
(3,400)
(3,400)
Recurring General Fund
Oxygen Delivery Gross Receipts
(8)
(8)
(9)
Recurring General Fund
(5)
(6)
(6)
Recurring
Local
Governments
Tax Incentives for Certain Health Insurers
(7,700)
(12,400)
(13,640)
Recurring General Fund
Sub Total - Amendments
(15,876)
(25,196)
(30,915)
Recurring General Fund
(1,170)
(1,831)
(1,947)
Recurring
Local
Governments
Health Care Provider Gross Receipts
(3,995)
(4,195)
(4,404)
Recurring General Fund
(2,218)
(2,329)
(2,445)
Recurring
Local
Governments
Grand Total
(19,871)
(29,390)
(35,319)
Recurring General Fund
(3,388)
(4,160)
(4,392)
Recurring
Local
Government
Revenue Impacts of House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC
Appropriation Impacts of House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC
Hearing and Vision Aid Dispenser Gross Receipts: According to TRD, the 2002 Economic
Census of Health Care Industries in New Mexico reports that offices of audiologists had total
revenue of $9.2 million and offices of optometrists had revenue of $55.6 million in 2002. The
estimated fiscal impact assumes that 75 percent of audiologist receipts and 10 percent of
optometrist receipts would be eligible for the proposed deduction. After adjusting for inflation,
that means about $18.7 million of receipts will be eligible for the deduction in FY08. Assuming a
statewide tax rate of 6.6 percent, revenues will decrease by about $1,230 thousand. About 60
percent of this revenue loss will accrue to the general fund and about 40 percent will accrue to
local governments.
Hospital Gross Receipts Credit: All of the state’s for-profit hospitals are currently located
within municipal areas, where the state tax rate is 3.775 percent. Therefore, the credit will
eliminate the state gross receipts tax paid by for-profit hospitals once it is fully phased in. The
bill does not apply to local option gross receipts taxes, so for-profit hospitals will still pay a little
over 1 percent local gross receipts tax.
A New Mexico Hospital Association survey on hospital gross receipts indicates that for-profit
hospitals paid gross receipts tax of $16.5 million in FY05 and $21.4 million in FY06, of which
pg_0005
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
5
60 percent went to the state and 40 percent went to local governments. Assuming that the
impacted tax base will grow by 10 percent each year, the credit will reduce general fund revenue
by about $3,040 thousand in FY08, $6,640 thousand in FY09, and $10,950 thousand in FY10,
$16,062 thousand in FY11, and $22,086 thousand once it is fully phased-in in FY12.
Indian Health Service Payment Gross Receipts: TRD reports that a 2004 Legislative Council
Service study showed total IHS spending in New Mexico for FY02 was $228.3 million. Adjusted
for growth in the national IHS budget, TRD estimates total IHS spending in New Mexico to be
$270 million in FY08. Federal survey data suggest that 22 percent of all health care spending is
for physician services, suggesting payments of $60 million per year for IHS physician services.
Some of these receipts are already eligible for gross receipts tax deductions under Sections 7-9-
93 and 7-9-77.1 NMSA. After subtracting receipts eligible for these other deductions, TRD
estimates a remaining tax base of $4.7 million in FY08. Based on a statewide tax rate of 6.6
percent, the bill will reduce revenue by about $313 thousand. Sixty percent of that revenue loss
will accrue to the general fund and 40 percent will accrue to local governments.
Because the gross receipts tax deduction created reduces billing by providers to the Medicaid
program the state will see budget savings in the Medicaid program. New Mexico’s average share
of Medicaid spending is 23 percent, so Medicaid savings are expected to be 23 percent of the
$313 revenue impact explained above, or $72 thousand.
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit: A study by the Legislative Health and Human
Services Committee entitled, “House Bill 955: Comprehensive Study on Health Care and Health
Care Costs in New Mexico," stated that in 2002, the New Mexico Hospital Association reported
total uncompensated care of $209 million. Growing that figure by 7 percent per year, the rate of
medical inflation, yields an estimate of $313.7 million total uncompensated care in FY08. The
New Mexico Medical Society reports that only 300 physicians would likely be eligible for the
proposed gross receipts tax credit based on the assumption that only surgeons are normally on
call.
TRD estimates that the credit will be equal to about $35 thousand per physician, for a total credit
amount of $10.5 million. However, TRD believes that tax liability for these 300 physicians will
only be about $13.2 thousand, or a total of $3,630 thousand. TRD assumes the credit will be
nonrefundable, so the fiscal impact will be capped at $3,630 thousand. The fiscal impact of the
bill is expected to phase in over a few years because services must remain unpaid for one year to
receive the proposed credit. About 60 percent of each year’s fiscal impact is expected to impact
the general fund, while the remaining 40 percent will impact local governments. The fiscal
impact is expected to grow by about 7 percent per year.
Rural Health Care Practitioner Tax Credit: Based on information from the Department of
Health, TRD estimates that about 900 practitioners will be eligible for the $5 thousand credit.
Multiplying this population by the maximum credit amounts yields a potential revenue loss of
$5.5 million. This impact was then adjusted downward to 40 percent of that amount to reflect
the following considerations:
(1) A 2003 report by the N.M. Health Policy Commission estimated that
approximately 55 percent of the respondents to a survey of licensed practitioners were
actively practicing medicine in New Mexico. Many were practicing in other states or
retired. A separate study by the Center for Health Workforce Studies estimated that only
52 percent of licensed physicians were actively practicing in the state.
pg_0006
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
6
(2) Some of the practicing physicians living in rural areas may be practicing only pat-
time in the rural area, thus they will receive the reduced tax credit.
(3) A $3,000 tax credit could offset tax on about $60,000 of taxable income,
equivalent to about $75,000 of total income. A $5,000 credit could completely offset tax
on $100,000 of taxable and $125,000 of total income. Many but not all practitioners will
be able to exhaust the full credit amount.
Oxygen Delivery Gross Receipts: Under current law, TRD is already counting oxygen as a
prescription drug, so the bill would only extend the deduction to oxygen and oxygen services that
are not prescribed by a doctor. TRD believes this will impact a small number of transactions with
tax base of about $200 thousand per year. Taxed at a statewide rate of 6.6 percent, the proposal
would reduce revenue by about $13.2 thousand per year. About 60 percent of that revenue loss
would be to the general fund and the remaining 40 percent to local governments.
Tax Incentives for Certain Health Insurers: Insurance premium taxes are collected by the
Public Regulation Commission for the benefit of the general fund. Thus, premium tax credits
reduce the amount of premium tax revenue to the general fund. NMMIP has projected future
assessments to grow from more than $20 million in 2006 to $50 million in 2009.
Under current law, the 30 and 50 percent tax credits result in a $14.6 million revenue loss for the
general fund for FY08. Under projections provided by NMMIP, the 50 and 75 percent tax
credits proposed in this bill result in a $22.3 million general fund revenue loss – a $7.7 million
difference.
Under current law, and assuming the same rate of growth in the 2008 assessment, the revenue
impact of the 30 and 50 percent credits for FY09 is $32.5 million. The 50 and 75 percent tax
credits proposed in this bill result in a $44.9 million general fund revenue loss – a $12.4 million
difference. The projections assume the same in growth rate in the tax credit for the 2008
assessment as in the 2007 assessment. This near doubling rate of growth is not expected in future
years as the Pool reaches its saturation point.
Health Practitioner Deduction: TRD reports that according to the Centers on Medicaid and
Medicare (CMS), total Medicare spending in New Mexico was $1.3 billion in 2004, a figure that
is expected to grow by about 10 percent per year. Currently, gross receipts tax deductions are
provided for receipts from Medicare for certain physicians’ services, nursing homes, clinical
laboratories, and home health care services. The remaining taxable gross receipts of physicians
addressed in the amendments to Section 7-9-77.1 are estimated to be $82.5 million in FY08.
Taxed at a statewide average rate of 6.6 percent, these amendments will reduce revenue by about
$5,545 thousand. About 60 percent of this revenue loss will accrue to the general fund, while 40
percent will be to local governments.
Clinical Laboratories: Based on the Report 80, TRD believes taxable gross receipts for clinical
labs not located in a physician’s office or a hospital will be $54 million in FY08. Based on
information from the federal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) and from
industry representatives, about 75 percent of that total comes from facilities not associated with
physicians’ offices or hospitals, and about 25 percent of these receipts come from managed care
insurers. Therefore, the fiscal impact to the general fund from the amendments to Section 7-9-93
NMSA 1978 is estimated to be $668.3 thousand in FY08 ($54 million X 75 percent X 25 percent
eligible receipts X 6.6 percent statewide tax rate). This impact includes the direct impact of
pg_0007
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
7
making these clinical laboratory receipts deductible, as well as the impact of holding local
governments harmless from the new deductions.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Hearing and Vision Aid Dispenser Gross Receipts: According to the National Center on
Hearing Assessment and Management, one in 10 Americans has hearing loss. However, about 30
percent of those (2.8 million) do not have hearing aids because they are unaffordable. DOH
reports that in 2006, the average cost of one hearing aid, accessories and related professional
services is about $3 thousand. The cost to an individual requiring two hearing aids would be
about $6 thousand.
Hearing loss is one of the most common birth defects in the United States. According to DOH,
about 80 infants with significant hearing loss are born in New Mexico each year. Hearing loss
prevalence increases with age: about 31 percent of New Mexicans over the age of 65 experience
hearing loss and DOH estimates that 70 to 90 percent of New Mexicans in nursing homes
experience hearing loss.
DOH reports that over half of New Mexicans under the age of 21 are enrolled in Medicaid,
which covers hearing and vision aids. Still, access to appropriate hearing and vision aids and
related services is limited due to Medicaid’s low reimbursement rate and coverage limits. The
New Mexico Medical Insurance Pool covers hearing aids but requires high deductibles. Hearing
aids are not covered under Medicare and a DOH survey of New Mexico’s largest HMO/PPO
plans found that hearing aids are excluded from coverage.
For children, vision aids may be covered by the Public Education Department during the school
year, but not for home use. Insurance rarely covers durable medical equipment such as the types
of vision aids that will qualify for the deduction created in this bill. While working adults may be
able to acquire vision aids through the Commission for the Blind and Visually Impaired, senior
citizens who are not seeking employment will not be served by that commission.
Hospital Gross Receipts Credit: Under current law, for-profit hospitals qualify for a 50 gross
receipts tax deduction (Section 7-9-73.1 NMSA 1978). The bill effectively reduces the gross
receipts tax paid by for-profit hospitals from 50 percent of the normal state rate to nothing once it
is fully phased-in in FY12.
About half of New Mexico’s hospitals are for-profit. For-profit hospitals compete with non-
profit hospitals in New Mexico and hospitals in neighboring states that do not pay gross receipts
tax. The New Mexico Hospital Association reports that this bill will remove a competitive
disadvantage against New Mexico’s for-profit hospitals.
According to the NMHA, rural hospitals have no choice but to absorb the costs of
uncompensated care for patients who cannot pay. In addition, it is difficult for for-profit hospitals
to pass gross receipts tax on to consumers because Medicare will not reimburse for it.
Indian Health Service Payment Gross Receipts: According to DOH and IAD, the proposed
gross receipts tax deduction would make it more profitable for medical providers to serve Native
American populations in New Mexico. Currently, 31 of New Mexico’s 33 counties are
designated as health professional shortage areas for primary care physicians.
pg_0008
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
8
IAD reports that Indian Health Service and tribal health care programs currently face difficulties
in recruiting health care practitioners due to below-average salaries.
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit: According to DOH, the New Mexico Medical
Society identified reducing gross receipts taxation on health services and reducing the burden of
uncompensated care for indigent patients as areas of concern for health practitioners in New
Mexico. This provision addresses these concerns by allowing physicians to reduce gross receipts
tax liability in proportion to the amount of uncompensated care they provide.
According to DOH, about 21 percent of New Mexicans are uninsured. In 2002, the National
Center for Health Workforce Analysis documented that 32.5 percent of New Mexicans live in
areas with a shortage of primary health care professionals. Currently, 31 of New Mexico’s 33
counties are designated as health professional shortage areas for primary care physicians.
Rural Health Care Practitioner Tax Credit: According to DOH, this provision would
establish a major new financial incentive for the recruitment and retention of health care
practitioners in rural underserved areas. In preliminary planning conducted by TRD and DOH, it
was estimated that as many as 750 individuals might participate, with tax credits totaling as
much as $3.5 million per year.
Several states have similar programs. Oregon has had a statewide program of this type in place
for over a decade, with more than 1,500 participants each year. Program officials in Oregon
report that their tax credit is an effective way to provide incentives to needed health care
practitioners, particularly in the area of retention. The credit would be more comprehensive than
Oregon’s.
Oxygen Delivery Gross Receipts: Oxygen used for breathing and prescribed and administered
by a physician already qualifies as a prescription drug under section 201(g)(1) of the federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 USC 321(g)(1)] because it is intended for use in the cure,
mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease.
Tax Incentives for Certain Health Insurers: The Medical Insurance Pool, established by
Chapter 54 of the Insurance Code, is a non-profit entity operating a high-risk health insurance
pool. The premiums charged to members are not sufficient to cover the costs, and this shortfall
is assessed to the health insurance industry. Assessed insurers then receive a 30 percent
premium tax credit for full premium plan losses and a 50 percent premium tax credit for reduced
premium plan losses.
The pool projects increases in the assessments levied on the health insurance industry. The
growth in these assessments is primarily the result of increased membership in the pool and
expansion of the reduced premium plan, which is available to low income persons. The
projected growth is also from the executive’s Insure New Mexico initiatives. Since the growth in
assessments is primarily coming from the low-income subsidy and Insure New Mexico, this
provision proposes shifts the cost from the commercial insurance industry to the state
government.
Health Practitioner Deduction: Recruitment and retention of health providers has been difficult
in New Mexico because of the gross receipts tax. Economic theory suggests that a shortage of
pg_0009
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
9
healthcare labor will push healthcare wages, and therefore healthcare costs higher. Although
much of this problem was addressed in 2004 when Section 7-9-93 NMSA 1978 was enacted,
some healthcare practitioners in New Mexico still pay gross receipts tax, while their counterparts
in most other states do not. Unlike many businesses that are subject to gross receipts tax but pass
the tax on to consumers, many health providers cannot pass the tax on because managed care
organizations and Medicare refuse to pay the tax.
According to the Health Policy Commission, in 2006, New Mexico ranked 4
th
lowest in the
nation in dentists per capita, 6
th
lowest in pharmacists per capita, 8
th
lowest in registered nurses
per capita, and 11
th
lowest in optometrists per capita. However, New Mexico ranked in the top
twelve states in terms of physical therapists, psychologists, speech and language pathologists,
and occupational therapists per capita. This suggests the provision could be more effective if it
amended Section 7-9-77.1 NMSA 1978 by adding only the types of practitioners in short supply
in New Mexico.
TRICARE is a managed care health insurance program for active duty military, active duty
service families, military retirees and their families, survivors, and active duty Reservists and
National Guard.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit: TRD reports that up to 3 FTE will be required
to process the credit because thousands of claims will have to be processed manually.
Instructions and publications will require revision and taxpayers and employees will require
education.
Determining the allowable credit will require a high level of audit and compliance efforts. TRD
auditors will need to determine maximum reimbursement rates, whether a doctor was on-call,
whether services were performed in a hospital rather than a physician’s office, whether the
service recipient was eligible for Medicaid, and whether one year has passed since billing.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Hearing and Vision Aid Dispenser Gross Receipts: Relates to HB 389 and HB 89.
Hospital Gross Receipts Credit: Relates to HB 524, SB 326, HB 23, and SB 161.
Indian Health Service Payment Gross Receipts: Relates to HB 245 and SB 11.
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit: Relates to HB 958 and SB 187.
Tax Incentives for Certain Health Insurers: Relates to SB 565 and HB 1164.
Health Care Provider Gross Receipts: Relates to SB 684, HB 797 and SB 893.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Indian Health Service Payment Gross Receipts: IAD recommends adding a definition of the
term “covered beneficiaries." A suggested definition may be found in the federal Indian Health
Care Improvement Act, Public Law 94-437, which defines the term “Indian."
Unpaid Health Services Gross Receipts Credit: The provision does not clarify whether or not
the gross receipts tax credit created is refundable or not. TRD reports that in the absence of
refundability language it will be presumed to be nonrefundable. If this presumption is
pg_0010
House Bill 638/aHBIC/aSFC – Page
10
successfully challenged, credit claims could be as large as the entire gross receipts tax base for
the credit, which was estimated to be $47 million.
The provision does not clearly define the terms “on-call" or “hospital."
DOH recommends clarifying the definition of “qualified health care services" to limit the credit
to uncompensated care provided in hospital clinics and emergency rooms by physicians with
staff privileges.
TRD suggests adding a recapture provision in the event that a physician receives payment for
services after claiming the credit.
TRD notes that Section 7-9-67 NMSA 1978 allows taxpayers reporting on an accrual accounting
basis to claim a deduction for uncollectible receipts. The bill would allow physicians that report
on an accrual basis to request a deduction and claim the credit, while cash basis physicians
would only be eligible for the credit.
Health Care Provider Gross Receipts: TRD notes that Section 7-9-93 might not be the right
location for the clinical laboratory deduction proposed in this bill because it adds clinical
laboratories to the list of health practitioners. However, clinical laboratories are defined as health
facilities under 42 U.S.C. Section 263a.
Clinical Laboratories: The Health Policy Commission notes that receipts of a clinical
laboratory in a free-standing clinic or anatomical laboratory owned by a pathologist will not
receive the clinical laboratories gross receipts tax deduction created in the bill. If this is not the
intent of the bill, HPC recommends deleting the words, “in a physician’s office or."
SS/mt