Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Hall
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/1/07
HB 783
SHORT TITLE
Educational Entity Insurance Coverage
SB
ANALYST Propst
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public School Insurance Authority
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 783 amends the definition of educational entities eligible to participate in the Public
School Insurance Authority. It expands the definition to include “non-profit organizations
dedicated to the improvement of public education and whose membership is composed
exclusively of public school employees, public schools or school districts".
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
PSIA estimates minimal fiscal impact as a result of HB 783.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
According to the FY 06 audit of PSIA, “There are three non-governmental not for profit entities
with approximately 50 total employees that are included as NMPSIA members but are not
technically eligible to be members per NM State Law Chapter 22 NMSA." These three groups
(NEA, NMAA, and AFTNM) have been participating in PSIA since PSIA’s inception in 1987.
By statute, NEA has two members on the PSIA Board and AFTNM has one member on the
PSIA Board.
pg_0002
House Bill 783 – Page
2
At its December 2006 Board meeting, the PSIA Board directed staff to put forth legislation to
clarify the statutory definition of educational entities to address the eligibility of employees of
education related groups to participate in PSIA. Without such clarification, PSIA would be
forced to terminate coverage on NEA, NMAA, and AFTNM and these groups would have to
secure coverage on an individual basis.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Expansion of the definition of educational entities would allow PSIA to continue to insure these
three groups and would also allow other educational entities (CES, NMSBA, etc.) to elect to
participate in PSIA.
Since the three groups in question are already in PSIA, no additional administrative work is
needed. If any additional educational entities sought coverage with PSIA, PSIA has the
processes in place to enroll them into the pool.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
PSIA reports that an
issue of anti-donation may exist if it is historically shown that these groups’ loss
ratios exceed the average PSIA pool loss ratio and an argument could be made that these non-
governmental groups’ premiums are subsidized by the school districts. However, since these groups
represent less than 2/10% of the entire PSIA pool, the impact of any possible anti-donation restriction is
not significant. Court rulings on ‘deminimis’ standards would apply.
Total PSIA Monthly Medical Premium: $17,641,204
Total Monthly Medical Premium NEA, NMAA, AFTNM: $29,634
Total PSIA Medical Employees: 25,540
Total NEA, NMAA, AFTNM Medical Employees: 46
Expansion of eligibility will offer improve availability of insurance coverage for those other educational
entities currently securing coverage on their own. Other educational entities have expressed a desire to
join the PSIA pool, for example, Cooperative Educational Services.
WEP/mt