Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Barela
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/21/2007
HB 1099
SHORT TITLE
Allow Certain Write-In Candidates.
SB
ANALYST Moser
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Secretary of State
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 1099 amends NMSA Section 1-8-36.1 of the Election Code governing write-in
candidates in primary elections to delete obsolete references to the State Board of Education
and to allow write-in candidates for Public Regulation Commission in those elections. The
bill additionally:
deletes requirements that a person file a declaration of intent to be a write-in candi-
date in a primary election with the proper filing officer;
requires that all ballots provide a space for the voter to write in the name of any per-
son for whom the voter wants to cast a vote for that office;
deletes current provisions establishing requirements for writing in the name of a de-
clared write-in candidate, and those provisions which prevent a write-in candidate in
the primary election from being certified as a candidate in the general election unless
the candidate receives at least the number of write-in votes in the primary election as
he would need signatures on a nominating petition.
amends NMSA Section 1-11-2 to eliminate the requirement that the proclamation is-
sued by the county clerk giving notice of an election contain the names and party af-
pg_0002
House Bill 1099 – Page
2
filiations of write-in candidates;
amends NMSA Section 1-12-19.1 to eliminate similar requirements and prohibitions
applicable to write-in candidates in general and special elections. It eliminates current
requirements for filing declarations of intent to be candidates, and those governing
writing in the name of a declared write-in candidate in those elections. It deletes pro-
visions which prevent an unopposed write-in candidate from having their election
certified unless the candidate receives at least the number of write-in votes as the
candidate would need signatures on a nominating petition. It deletes the prohibition
against a person being a write-in candidate in the general election who was a candi-
date in the primary election immediately prior to the general election.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The AGO indicates that this bill would significantly relax requirements in current state law gov-
erning write-in candidates. Current law requires that write-in candidates for primary, general,
and special elections file declarations of intent to be candidates with the “proper filing officer"
who is either the Secretary of State or county clerk, depending upon the office sought. State law
also requires that the name written in on a ballot be the name of a declared write-in candidate and
show two initials and last name; first name, middle initial or name and last name; first and last
name; or the full name as it appears on the declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate and
misspellings of the above combinations that can be reasonably determined by a majority of the
members of the precinct board to identify a declared write-in candidate. This bill would delete
those requirements.
The Secretary of State “…takes no position on whether or not a write-in candidate should have to
declare this intention in advance of the election." Concern was expressed however regarding the
removal of campaign finance reporting requirements from these candidates. The Secretary of
State indicates that write-in candidates sometimes expend great sums of money to announce their
name and convince votes to write in their names. The Secretary of State feels that all candidates
should disclose contributions and be subject to campaign finance reporting laws. In addition, by
removing the minimum vote requirements for unopposed write-in candidates, a person could be
elected to office with minimal support and no public knowledge of the campaign.
AMENDMENTS
The Secretary recommends the following amendments:
1-8-36.1(E): At the time of filing the declaration of intent to be a write
-
in candidate, the
A
write-
in candidate shall be considered a candidate for all purposes and provisions relating to candidates
in the Election Code, including all obligations to report pursuant to the Campaign Reporting Act,
except that he
write-in candidates
shall not be entitled to have his
their
name printed on the bal-
lot.
1-8-36.1(F): No unopposed
write-in candidate shall have his a
nomination certified unless he
the
candidate
receives at least the number of write-in votes in the primary election as he
the candi-
date
would need signatures on a nominating petition pursuant to the requirements set out in Sec-
tion 1-8-33 NMSA 1978.
1-12-19.1(C): At the time of filing the declaration of intent to be a write
-
in candidate, the
A
pg_0003
House Bill 1099 – Page
3
write- in candidate shall be considered a candidate for all purposes and provisions relating to
candidates in the Election Code, including all obligations to report pursuant to the Campaign
Reporting Act, except that he
write-in candidates
shall not be entitled to have his
their
name
printed on the ballot.
1-12-19.1(G): No unopposed
write-in candidate shall have an election certified unless the can-
didate receives at least the number of write-in votes as the candidate would need signatures on a
nominating petition pursuant to the requirements set out in Section 1-8-33 NMSA 1978.
GM/mt