Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lujan, B.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2-24-07
3-08-07 HB 1179/aHENRC
SHORT TITLE Rural Infrastructure Loan Cap & Scope
SB
ANALYST Aubel
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$0.01*
*See narrative
Recurring
Rural Infrastructure
Revolving Loan Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
$0.01*
$0.01* Recurring Administrative
Account
Duplicates Senate Bill 1058/aSJC
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED)
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources (EMNRD)
New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HENRC Amendment
The House Energy and Natural Resources Committee Amendment makes three changes to HB
1179:
1.
It strikes the “phrase “but not limited to" for definitions relating to “operate and
pg_0002
House Bill 1179/aHENRC – Page
2
maintain", “solid waste facility", “wastewater facility", and “water supply facility,"
effectively limiting the scope of the definitions to that which is specifically listed.
2.
In specifying remedies for NMED in response to a loan default, the Amendment strikes
the specified means of remedy and reference to loan default, creating a broader authority
for the department to “enforce its rights as provided by law."
3.
The payment options are expanded from annual to include monthly and quarterly
schedules.
NMED concludes that these changes do not significantly affect the purpose or intent of the bill.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 1179 amends the Rural Infrastructure Act (Act) to allow the New Mexico
Environment Department (NMED) to expand the scope of eligible communities, makes solid
waste disposal projects eligible for funding, increases NMED’s authority to ensure project
sustainability, and allows for administrative costs. HB 1179 also increases the grant portion
funding from $200 thousand to $500 thousand, while increasing the maximum assistance for
both loans and grants from $500 thousand to $2 million.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill specifies that money in the fund is appropriated to the department to carry out the
provisions of the Act, not to exceed 10 percent of the available uncommitted balance in the fund.
Money allocated for administrative expenses will be placed in a separate administrative account
and any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining in this administrative account at the
end of the fiscal year shall not revert to the rural infrastructure revolving loan fund.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
NMED lists the significant issues as follows:
The definition of eligible entities is revised, raising the population limit from 10,000 to 20,000
and breaking out counties with populations less than 200,000. This is necessary to
accommodate the addition of solid waste facilities as eligible projects because most are
operated by counties with populations greater than 10,000.
Solid waste facilities, in addition to water and wastewater facilities, would be eligible for
loans. Few funding sources exist for solid waste projects and this would help fill that gap.
Up to 10 percent of rural infrastructure revolving loan fund could be used to pay for
administrative expenses necessary to carry out the provisions of the Act. NMED would need
to project the administrative cost and place that amount in a separate account to be used solely
for administration. This would help make this program self-sufficient and ensure adequate
administration for the life of the 20-year loans.
The annual cap on loans to an eligible entity would be raised from $500,000 to $2 million.
That would bring the program in line with current construction costs and provide money for
larger projects, such as solid waste projects. The current limit dates from the inception of the
pg_0003
House Bill 1179/aHENRC – Page
3
Act in 1988. The limit for grants, as provided for in the Act, would also be updated from
$200,000 to $500,000. Note that currently no funds are available for grants.
NMED’s authority to manage the loans would be expanded to allow periodic reviews of
operation, request financial statements and review the rate-setting analysis that supports the
loan payments. Those changes provide more tools should the borrower become delinquent in
his loan.
NMFA notes that with the increase of available funding for municipalities and counties with HB
1179, the RIP Loan would be in direct competition with NMFA’s Public Project Revolving Fund
loan.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
NMED maintains the agency would benefit from the proposed changes by providing greater
ability to initiate projects that preserve surface- and groundwater quality. Potential borrowers
would also benefit by having access to larger loans to completely fund projects that would
protect human health and the environment.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
NMED states that it be better suited to manage and administer the loans with the increase in
authority and the addition of revenue to support those tasks.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Duplicates Senate Bill 1058.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
EMNRD suggests that this bill may increase the number of solid waste facilities. Although
projected savings cannot be determined, solid waste management is a substantial operational and
financial issue for the State Parks Division (SPD), which serves over 4 million people annually at
parks located throughout the state. By increasing the number of communities eligible for these
loans, as well as making solid waste handling facilities eligible for this loan program, it may
result in increased access to solid waste facilities for agencies such as SPD, which operate in
many rural areas. Having more, and hopefully closer, solid waste handling facilities may help
limit increases or reduce hauling costs and solid waste management contract costs incurred by
SPD to the extent increased availability of loans and grants to local entities may limit or reduce
price increases to their customers, as well as allow them to offer more services to SPD.
NMED states that the New Mexico Municipal League, New Mexico Association of Counties,
New Mexico Rural Water Association and the Solid Waste Association of North America
endorsed this bill.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
If HB 1179 is not enacted, solid waste projects will not have an additional funding source and
communities will continue to be restricted in the amount of the loan they can obtain from this
program.
MA/nt