Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Arnold-Jones
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
3/01/07
HB 1217
SHORT TITLE Bond Exclusion from Income Tax
SB
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
(11,000.0)
(11,000.0) Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 1217 removes state and local bond interest from the definition of base income as
defined in the Income Tax Act and the Corporate Income and Franchise Tax Act. This would
exempt this type of income from income tax liability. The change would be effective for tax year
2007 and subsequent years. The interest on bonds issued by the State of New Mexico and local
governments are already tax-exempt as is the interest on federal bonds. This would include other
state and local bonds issued outside of New Mexico.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD:
Information from New Mexico Individual and Corporate Income Tax returns yields the
following: non-New Mexico state and local government bond dividend and interest
income is currently claimed on approximately 32,000 of the state’s approximately
900,000 personal income tax returns, and generates tax obligations totaling
approximately $9 million against individual income tax liability. Non-New Mexico state
pg_0002
House Bill 1217 – Page
2
and local bond interest and dividend is reported on approximately 1,000 corporate
income tax returns, and generates tax obligations totaling approximately $2 million
annually. The $11 million impact shown above is the simple sum of the two figures.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau
(
http://www.legis.state.wi.us/lfb/Informationalpapers/4.pdf
):
State and Municipal Bond Interest. [All] states are required by federal law to exempt
interest income derived from U.S. obligations from tax. In 2005, 36 states also provided a
tax exemption for interest earned from their own state and municipal bonds. The state of
Utah also provided an exemption for interest from non-Utah state and municipal bonds
from states that provided a reciprocal exemption of interest from Utah obligations.
Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, and Wisconsin exempted only specific state and local obligations.
All state and municipal bond interest was exempt in Indiana, North Dakota (for standard-
form filers), and the District of Columbia.
TRD:
New Mexico’s practice of exempting interest and dividend of bonds issued by the state or its political
subdivisions is widespread among states. However:
“...
in Davis v. Department of Revenue,
the Kentucky Court of Appeals held that the
state’s taxation of income from other states’ bonds, while exempting income from
Kentucky bonds, discriminated against interstate commerce in violation of the
Commerce
Clause. The court first observed that the Kentucky scheme “[c]learly" was “facially"
discriminatory because “it obviously affords more favorable treatment to in-state bonds
than it does to extraterritorially issued bonds."
1
The proposed legislation is thus consistent with the ruling by the Kentucky Court of Appeals.
NF/mt
1
Walter Hellerstein – “State and Local Tax Commentary" Issue 9, April 2006:
http://ria.thomson.com/taxresearch/statelocal/hellerstein.pdf.