Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR
Rodella
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/20/07
HB
1255
SHORT TITLE
Excusals from Jury Duty
SB
ANALYST
C. Sanchez
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB 170
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court (BCMC)
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 1255 amends NMSA Section 38-5-2 (1978) to allow a person to be excused from jury
service without the person’s personal attendance upon the court.
The bill adds a new Subsection C that provides that a person may be excused from jury service
without attendance upon the court if he or she provides, within the time indicated on the jury
summons, a written request supported by satisfactory evidence for exemption from jury service
due to extreme physical hardship.
The bill also adds a new Subsection D to the above statute that provides that a person who is
excused from jury service due to extreme physical hardship shall not be summoned for jury
service for at least three (3) years from the date of excusal.
pg_0002
House Bill 1255 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Passage of the bill will require State Courts to increase the number of summonses that are mailed
per week, and will add an unknown cost to the Court for providing jury panels in jury-eligible
cases.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The bill provides no guidance as to what is to be considered either “extreme physical hardship"
or “satisfactory evidence for exemption from jury service."
According to the Bernalillo Metropolitan Court, courts are experiencing a high rate of excusals
for single parents and caregivers and a similarly high rate of individuals who fail to appear in
response to their jury summonses. As a result, courts are already straining to meet the increasing
number of jury demands. A blanket excusal of three (3) years for extreme physical hardship will
further disrupt the ability to seat panels on jury-eligible cases.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
HB 1255 relates to SB 170 which, if passed, will likewise amend NMSA Section 38-5-2 (1978)
to increase the number of individuals who are eligible to be excused from jury service. SB 170
will excuse from jury duty expectant and breast feeding mothers, parents and guardians without
full time employment who have custody of a child under six (6) years of age and caregivers for
the elderly and infirmed.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Status Quo
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Presently, what accommodations are made for jurors with extremely physical hardship.
CS/csd