Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Stapleton
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/9/07
2/11/07 HB HJR 7
SHORT TITLE PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS, CA
SB
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
See Narrative Recurring
Local
Government
See Narrative.
Recurring
(every two
years)
General
Obligation Bond
Capacity
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to SB 695
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Taxation and Revenue Department
US Census
Responses Received From
Higher Education Department
Taxation and Revenue Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Joint Resolution 7 amends the constitution to provide an exemption from property taxes
for homeowners 67 and older. To be eligible, the property must be assessed at less than
$250,000. The homeowner must have resided their 25 years or longer and have taxable income
of less than $50,000.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The fiscal implications of HJR 7 are significant. As table one shows, the property value subject
to the exemption is estimated to be $4.5 billion and the taxable value is $1.5 billion or 3.5
percent of total taxable value in NM. The amount of tax is $40 million but this amount would be
pg_0002
House Joint Resolution 7 – Page
2
shifted to other taxpayers via higher rates due to the property tax mechanism. There would also
be an impact on general obligation bond capacity though the magnitude is uncertain. General
obligation bonds are issued every odd year upon approval of the citizens.
Table 1: Summary of Calculations and Assumptions
Tax Returns (2005 NM PIT Returns – TRD)
799,741
Share > 65 (2005 US Census)
12.2%
Elderly Pop (Tax returns * Share >65)
97,568
Share < 50 k TI (205 NM PIT Returns – TRD)
87%
Eligible Pop (Elderly Pop * Share < 50 k)
84,885
Homeowners (American Home Survey, 2005)
80%
Tenure (American Home Survey, 2005)
53%
Median Value (Census 2005)
125,500
PROP VALUE
4,518,072,492
Tax Value (Prop value / 3)
1,506,024,164
Tax Rate (NM TRD)
$26.62 / $1000
Tax Liability
$ 40,090,363
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
SB 695 caps the growth in property valuation to no more than 3 percent.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The proposed amendment uses taxable income rather than adjusted gross income. A $50,000 cap
on taxable income includes most New Mexicans (87 percent) and implies an adjusted gross
income of approximately $70,000. If the intent was to target low income taxpayers, adjusted
gross income is a better measure to use.
NF/nt