Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Stewart
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/06/07
HB HM 64
SHORT TITLE New Mexico as Energy Conservation Leader
SB
ANALYST Aubel
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
See Fiscal Impact Non-Recurring
General Fund
See Fiscal Impact
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
See Fiscal Impact
Recurring General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
See Fiscal
Impact
Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 534, SB 543, SB 542, SB 404
Potential Conflict with HB 16, HB 180
Duplicates HJM 12
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
pg_0002
House Memorial 64 – Page
2
Responses Received From
New Mexico Department of Environment (NMED)
Energy, Minerals, Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
Public Education Department (PED)
General Services Division, Building Services Department (GSD, BSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Memorial 64
urges the state to become a leader in reducing greenhouse gases through
resource conservation and the use of alternative energy.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
House Memorial 64 does not appropriate funding from any source. However, the initiatives
listed in HM 64 suggest required recurring (for recurring programs) and non-recurring (for one-
time programs) appropriations for their implementation. These appropriations would range from
the relatively small cost of consumer awareness campaigns, to the intermediate cost of planting
trees, to the significant costs of creating wetlands or providing research grants. Other proposals
contained in HM 64 would result in a reduction of revenues to the general fund, such as tax
credits. As an indication of such revenue fiscal reductions, the following table presents energy
policy initiatives (Appendix B) from the Executive’s Budget in Brief
. The actual fiscal impact of
specific legislation may vary from these amounts.
Revenue Initiatives (General Fund Fiscal Impacts in Millions)
FY07 FY08
FY09
FY10
Expand definition of biomass for
renewable energy production credits
-
(0.3)
(0.3)
(0.3)
Alternative fuel refueling facility tax
credit
(0.1) (0.2)
(0.3)
(0.4)
Advanced energy investment tax credits -
(0.2)
(0.2)
(0.2)
Earmark conservation tax for land
conservation
-
(10.5)
(9.9)
(9.4)
Income tax credit for efficient heating
and cooling
(0.4) (0.7)
(0.8)
(0.8)
GRT holiday for Energy Star appliances -
(0.5)
(0.5)
(0.6)
Increase renewable energy credit for
solar appliances
-
(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.1)
Tax credits for “Green" buildings
(0.1) (0.4)
(0.7)
(1.1)
Income tax credit for biofuels
distributors
(0.1) (0.2)
(0.4)
(1.4)
Investment credit for biofuels facilities (0.1) (0.1)
(0.1)
(0.1)
Positive, recurring operating budget impacts would accrue from any reduction in energy costs to
the state as a result of implementing strategies promoting energy-efficiency for state-run
buildings and programs. EMNRD stated that simply replacing 50 of the most-frequently used
lights in a building with
ENERGY STAR-qualified models, the state could save more than $600
pg_0003
House Memorial 64 – Page
3
a year per building. Additional operating savings have been noted for energy-efficient buildings,
which usually require a higher up-front cost that is defrayed over time by the lower operating
costs.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
HM 64 suggests that human activities are contributing to global warming, which has been
forecasted to have negative effects such as extreme weather cycles of drought and floods,
increased fire seasons, and loss of habitat and species.
To help combat such changes, HM 64 requests New Mexico become a leader in energy
conservation and related endeavors and specifies several action items to be performed by various
governmental entities:
Governor: declare a “Climate Change Awareness Day" to educate residents about
climate change.
Legislature: consider adopting income tax credits for Energy Star certified appliances.
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD): Initiate a “Get a Bright
Idea" consumer awareness campaign regarding energy conservation.
All State Agencies:
o
Replace light bulbs with compact fluorescent and automatic timers on lights and
heating and cooling systems.
o
Use energy-efficient vehicles for fuel conservation.
o
Encourage employees to carpool or use public transportation.
o
Support sustainable energy production through research.
New Mexico Schools: Recycle paper, cardboard, plastic, aluminum and glass.
EMNRD noted that through such activities HM 64 has the potential to have a broad impact on
energy reduction across the state by raising awareness of climate change issues and putting forth
strategies to address the problem.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
HM 64 may help increase the output of EMNRD programs by greatly facilitating agency efforts
to expand energy efficiency programs renewable energy development.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
HM 64 relates to several bills that specify tax credits:
Senate Bill 543 and House Bill 534: Sustainable Building Credit
Senate Bill 542: Energy Efficient Appliance Tax Credit
Senate Bill 404: Residential Energy-Efficient Loan
Because it recommends replacing incandescent bulbs with more energy-efficient florescent
lighting, HM 64 potentially conflicts with House Bill 16 and House Bill 180, which indicate that
improperly disposed broken fluorescent lights are a contributor of mercury to the environment.
pg_0004
House Memorial 64 – Page
4
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
EMNRD suggested that HJM12 complements the existing statewide initiatives to make New
Mexico the “Clean Energy State" and the “Lead by Example" initiatives for state government
including Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Reduction (EO-2005-033); Climate Change
Action Implementation Team (EO-2006-69); Energy Efficient Green Building Standards (EO-
2006-001); Requiring Increased Use of Renewable Fuels (EO-2005-049) and; meeting the goals
of the Chicago Climate Exchange to reduce carbon emissions.
PED reported that the Public Schools Clean Energy Task Force recommended that new
construction and major renovation of all new school projects set a goal of reducing energy
consumption by 50 percent, based on the national average. To facilitate this process and initiate
the practice of continuous improvement, the task force also recommends doing a pilot program
with four to five schools.
ALTERNATIVES
PED noted that school districts have the option of entering into guaranteed savings contracts with
qualified providers for up to 10 years to finance, purchase and install energy efficiency measures
in their buildings through the Public Building Energy Efficiency Act, 6-23-1 NMSA 1978.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
State agencies will continue to implement energy efficiency and greenhouse emission reduction
programs as mandated in the various executive orders with no additional direction from the
legislature.
MA/csd