Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Garcia, M.J.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/26/07
2/26/07 HB
SHORT TITLE Prohibit Cockfighting
SB
10/aSJC/aSFL#1,#2,#3
/aHAGC
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB70
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Corrections Department
Public Defender Department (PDD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HAGC Amendment
House Agriculture and Water Resources Committee amendment revises the penalties and states
that a
ny person violating the provisions of Subsection A or B of this section as it pertains to cocks: (1)
upon a first conviction, is guilty of a petty misdemeanor; (2) upon a second conviction, is guilty of a
misdemeanor; and (3) upon a third and subsequent conviction is guilty of a fourth degree felony.
Synopsis of SFl#3 Amendment
Strikes the Senate Floor Amendment #3 eliminating the Senate Judiciary Committee amendment.
Replaces Senate Floor Amendment “changing penalties" with “Any person violating the
provisions of Subsection A or B of this section as it pertains to cocks:"
pg_0002
Senate Bill 10/aSJC/aSFL #1, #2, #3/aHAGC – Page
2
Synopsis of SFl#2 Amendment
Senate Floor Amendment #2 to SCONC/SJC/SB 10 as amended, adds the word “dog" to specify
the type of the contest.
Synopsis of SFl#1 Amendment
Senate Floor Amendment #1 to SCONC/SJC/SB 10 as amended, strikes all senate judiciary
committee amendments and changes the penalties so that a first conviction is guilty of a petty
misdemeanor; a second conviction is guilty of a misdemeanor; and adds upon a third and
subsequent conviction.
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
Senate Judiciary Committee Amendment #1 clarify that a person violating the provisions of
Subsection A or B of this section is guilty of a fourth degree felony as it pertains to dogs.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 10 amends Section 30-18-1 NMSA 1978 by deleting section K., which states “The
provisions of this section shall not be interpreted to prohibit cockfighting in New Mexico."
Senate Bill 10 also amends Section 30-18-9, which concerns penalties related to dog fighting, so
that all such penalties also apply to cockfighting, making violation of the act a fourth degree
felony. It would thus be unlawful to cause, sponsor, arrange, hold, or participate in a cockfight
for monetary gain or entertainment. It would also be unlawful to be present without attempting to
stop the fight, or owning or equipping one of the roosters with knowledge of the upcoming fight.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Although, there are some countries where cockfighting exists, there are only two states in the
U.S. that do not ban cockfighting, New Mexico and Louisiana. Local ordinances in 13 counties
and 28 municipalities in New Mexico have passed ordinances outlawing cockfighting.
Cockfighting remains an unregulated industry but supporters of cockfighting suggest that it
generates an economic benefit of $50 million per year to the state and that the conduct of
cockfighting is a private activity.
Opposition to cockfighting argue that it perpetuates violence in our communities and that there is
a link between cruelty to animals and violence toward humans.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Duplicates SB70
pg_0003
Senate Bill 10/aSJC/aSFL #1, #2, #3/aHAGC – Page
3
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
Is cockfighting a licensed industry.
2.
If cockfighting is considered a sport, should it be regulated.
3.
Does cockfighting generate revenue for the state, e.g., gross receipts taxes.
4.
What benefit does cockfighting provide to the state.
EO/nt