Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Garcia
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
01/25/07
02/13/07 HB
SHORT TITLE NMFA Public Project Revolving Fund
SB 80/aSPAC/aSFC
ANALYST Hanika Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI (See narrative)
Public Project
Revolving Loan Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA)
Environment Department (ED)
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee Amendment strikes the SPAC amendment and expands the
purpose of projects for the Town of Carrizozo and Lincoln County to include road projects;
expands the purpose of projects in Torrance County to include water, wastewater, land, and road
projects; requests authorization for NMFA to provide refinancing assistance to Torrance County;
and, qualifies an additional 115 entities to pursue loans, including refinancing assistance, for
public projects from the PPRF.
Synopsis of SPAC Amendment
The Senate Public Affairs Committee Amendment qualifies 108 additional entities to pursue
loans from the public project revolving fund.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 80 authorizes the NMFA to make loans for 32 public projects from the public project
revolving fund (PPRF) to certain state and local government entities, as defined in the bill, based
pg_0002
Senate Bill 80/a SPAC/a SFC -Page
2
on certain terms and conditions including the desire to continue to pursue a loan by FY09.
SB 80 contains an emergency clause that the Act takes effect immediately.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 80 does not appropriate funds; however, loans made in the interim as a result of
passage of this bill will result in reducing the current loan capacity of PPRF. The bill will
support borrowers in receiving fixed “AAA" insured interests rates with the NMFA. Borrowers
may also qualify for disadvantaged funding which provides 0% and 3% interest rates with
maximum funding of $75,000 per equipment loan and $200 thousand per infrastructure loan. To
date, PPRF has financed 451 projects statewide totaling $628 million.
A significant source of capital for infrastructure projects administered by NMFA, approximately
$18 million per year, is derived from an annual distribution of 75% of the state’s Governmental
Gross Receipts Tax (GGRT). In addition to GGRT, NMFA raises capital through the issuance of
tax-exempt pooled bonds and direct loan repayments. The following chart demonstrates the
annual distribution of GGRT for FYO6:
FY06 GGRT Di stribution
(Total $25.9 million-Unaudite d)
$3.6
$2.6
$0.3
$1.8
$17.6
$-
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
Demand for PPRF funding has increased significantly from fiscal year to fiscal year. The graph
below provided by NMFA depicts the growth of senior lien lending activity and shows the
demand trend for PPRF funding.
PPRF Annual Activity
by millions of dollars and numbers of projects
0
50
100
150
200
FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY05 FY 06
0
20
40
60
80
100
Millions
Number of projects
pg_0003
Senate Bill 80/a SPAC/a SFC -Page
3
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Loans from PPRF allow eligible entities to borrow for infrastructure projects at below market
costs, based on terms and conditions established by NMFA. NMFA reports SB 80 is not a
guarantee that any project will receive a PPRF loan. Loans will only be made to those borrowers
that can identify a sufficient repayment source and meet other financial criteria.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Duplicates HB 24
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Public school districts have a great need to update their facilities and may have access to below
market rates. In addition, ED reports that other proposed public projects loan requests involve the
reuse of water. Well designed reuse initiatives can provide greater water quality protections of
groundwater resources in the state.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Entities requesting PPRF financing from the NMFA will be required to seek alternative
financing which could increase borrowing costs.
AHO/nt