Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Carraro
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/25/2007
3/14/2007 HB
SHORT TITLE
Prevention of Wrong-Way
Highway Traffic Study
SB 121/aSFC/aSFl
ANALYST Moser
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
3,000.0
Non-Recurring
State Road Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
NM Department of Transportation (NMDOT)
NM Department of Public Safety (DPS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFl Amendment
Senate Floor Amendment to Senate Bill 121 as amended expands the scope of the pilot project to
look at alternatives to include the use of tire spikes to prevent wrong-way traffic on highway off
ramps.
Synopsis of SFC Amendment
Senate Finance Committee Amendment to Senate Bill 121 changes the appropriation from the
General Fund to the State Road Fund.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 121 proposes a pilot project to assess the feasibility of using spikes at ramps to
prevent wrong-way access. A total appropriation of $3,000,000 is proposed from the General
Fund to the Department of Transportation for fiscal years 2007 and 2008.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 121/aSFC/aSFl – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Fiscal implications would not apply to the cost of installation since funding is appropriated from
the General Fund. However, there may be additional fiscal implications to the NMDOT with
respect to system monitoring and system maintenance. This will vary contingent upon the
number of locations selected in the pilot study.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
A pilot study usually, by definition implies a limited and controlled study. Results of a limited
and controlled study would be isolated in nature and could very well not provide a solid basis to
form an opinion as to the success of the program and whether to deploy such systems on a wider
scale. The NMDOT indicates the value of such a pilot project would increase if there were
sufficient sites selected for the pilot study. This could have substantial impacts on the cost to
develop, deploy and maintain the project.
NMDOT points out that while many other states are investigating ways to deter wrong way entry
on off-ramps, no states are utilizing spikes at ramps because of the significant safety issues
involved. One-way tire puncture apparatus has been investigated in other states for feasibility of
deterring wrong way entries onto high-speed facilities, however the effectiveness of the
apparatus is questionable since tests of the systems have shown they fail to deflate tires fast
enough to prevent entry onto the high speed facility. In addition, new puncture resistant tires
may not deflate at all, or worse, they may be slightly damaged and then blow-out later when the
vehicle is traveling at a high rate of speed, possibly contributing to fatalities unrelated to wrong-
way entry. In addition maintenance of the apparatus is difficult and the systems that are
currently available are not designed for high speeds. If spikes break in heavy traffic, remaining
stubs can damage tires of right way vehicles, also possibly causing blow-outs when the vehicle is
traveling at a high rate of speed at some later time.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The NMDOT affirmatively states that this pilot study will have an impact on maintenance
operations and expressed concern regarding potential damage to equipment and vehicles due to
the current manner in which the department maintains on and off ramps. These concerns could
easily be addressed through training and the proper selection of equipment.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
This bill may have implications regarding the resources necessary (personnel and equipment) to
NMDOT and other affected agencies (State and local police) to establish, administer and
evaluate the project.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The NMDOT raises concerns regarding increased liability for the Department relative to claims
to damaged vehicles. The department argues that the system could very well produce roadside
hazards by having immobile vehicles on the ramps, backing up queues into the traveling lanes of
the highway.
GM/nt