Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Carraro
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/30/07
HB
SHORT TITLE
DWI As Prior Felony For Sentencing
SB
451
ANALYST
C. Sanchez
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB 441
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Corrections Department (NMCD)
Public Defender Department (PD)
New Mexico Sentencing Commission
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
This bill amends the Habitual Offender Sentencing Act, NMSA 1978, § 31-18-17 to include a
prior DWI felony conviction under the DWI statute, NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102, as a “useable"
prior for enhancement purposes.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Under the current habitual offender statute, persons convicted of more than one noncapital felony
are considered habitual offenders whose basic sentences (for subsequent felonies) are increased
by one year (for a second felony), four years (for a third felony) and eight years (for a fourth or
subsequent felony). However, under the current statute, DWI felony convictions pursuant to
Section 66-8-102 are not considered felony convictions for purposes of determining habitual
offender status/sentence enhancement.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 451 – Page
2
The bill amends the habitual offender statute to require that a DWI conviction pursuant to
Section 66-8-102 be considered a predicate felony offense that must be used in determining if the
person is a habitual offender. Since many individuals have felony DWI convictions, they will be
habitual offenders (and serve enhanced basic sentences) if convicted of another felony (including
another DWI felony) in the future. This will mean longer prison sentences and potentially longer
periods of probation supervision. There is no appropriation in the bill to cover any of these
increased costs to the Department.
The contract/private prison annual cost of incarcerating an inmate is $23,867 per year for males.
The cost per client to house a female inmate at a privately operated facility is $21,651 per year.
Because state owned prisons are essentially at capacity, any net increase in inmate population
will be housed at a contract/private facility.
The cost per client in Probation and Parole for a standard supervision program is $1,467 per year.
The cost per client in Intensive Supervision programs is $3,383 per year. The cost per client in
department-operated Community Corrections programs is $3,503 per year. The cost per client in
privately-operated Community Corrections programs is $7,917 per year. The cost per client per
year for male and female residential Community Corrections programs is $39,401.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Ten years ago, in State v. Anaya, 123 N.M. 14 (1997), the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that
a felony conviction for DWI does not count as a prior felony conviction for purposes of
sentencing under the Habitual Offender Act. When a person is being sentenced for a felony and
the person has one or more prior felony convictions, the present sentence is increased by one
year for one prior felony, four years for two prior felonies, and eight years for three or more prior
felonies. NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-17. The New Mexico Supreme Court in Anaya concluded
that the legislature did not intend to include what was then the newly created DWI felony among
those felony convictions to which the Habitual Offender Act sentencing applies. The Court
found “Where, as here, the legislative intent with regard to the applicability of a criminal
sentencing statute is unclear and ambiguous, it is for the legislature to clarify its intent and not
the prerogative of this Court." SB 441 appears intended to address the Court’s invitation to
remove ambiguity and lack of clarity by requiring a felony DWI conviction be treated the same
as any other felony conviction for purpose of habitual offender sentencing.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The increases in penalties for DWI offenses, including felony convictions for repeat offenders,
have resulted in a dramatic rise in the number of DWI cases that go to trial and in the complexity
of these cases. Appellate and trial time devoted to DWI cases has required a greater devotion of
court resources than before penalties were increased. Courts will have to grapple with
challenges to the proposal to apply habitual offender sentencing to felony DWI convictions, a
process that will have a performance impact that cannot be stated with certainty.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
This bill could have a minimal to substantial negative effect on the state’s ability to provide
prison-related and probation/parole supervision services, depending on the number of individuals
who are identified as habitual offenders because of this bill.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 451 – Page
3
Depending on just how many DWI felony offenders there are in New Mexico and how many of
those offenders receive a second or subsequent felony conviction for DWI or another crime, this
bill could result in a minimal to substantial increase in prison population and probation/parole
caseloads.
The state might be able to absorb and handle the prison population and probation/parole caseload
increases with its current staff and current prison space, but not if the bill causes substantial
increases to the prison population or probation/parole caseloads.
DUPLICATION
SB 441 is an exact duplicate.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
For purposes of the courts’ ability to interpret legislative intent, it would be useful for the bill to
state whether it applies to pending prosecutions on its effective date, July 1, 2007, based on the
date of the crime, the date of charging, or the date of sentencing. See State v. Shay, 136 N.M. 8,
10 (Ct.App.), certiorari quashed, 137 N.M. 266 (2005).
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
A felony DWI conviction will continue to be the only felony in New Mexico for which a
convicted felon avoids application of habitual offender sentencing.
CS/csd