Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Snyder
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/2/2007
2/14/2007 HB
SHORT TITLE District Court and Attorney Quarters
SB 491/a SJC/a SFC
ANALYST Schuss
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
Unknown Unknown Unknown Recurring General /
County
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Administrative Office of the District Attorney (AODA)
Response Not Received From
Association of Counties
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFC Amendment
The Senate Finance Committee Amendment clarifies that each county will provide “adequate
quarters" for district attorney facilities; and, defines such to include buildings, permanent
fixtures, and any other items reasonably expected to be part of the building.
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
The amendment proposed by the Senate Judiciary Committee removes certain items that were
listed as the counties responsibility.
For the District Courts; parking, other built-in furniture and security personnel have been
removed from the “adequate quarters" section.
For the District Attorney, security personnel has been removed from the “adequate quarters"
section.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 491/a SJC/a SFC – Page
2
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 491 clarifies the duty of the counties to provide adequate quarters, maintenance
service and necessary utilities for the district courts and district attorneys.
The State (district courts and district attorneys) pays for:
1. movable personal property, including furniture, equipment, books and supplies; moving
expenses;
2. security equipment including video cameras and equipment, key cards, magnetometers, and x-
ray machines;
3. information technology equipment, systems and service of any type, including basic wire
telephone equipment, systems and service and voice, data and low-voltage infrastructure systems
inside the court quarters in compliance with the telecommunication standard for building and
campus distribution systems promulgated by the general services department or the office of the
New Mexico chief information officer; and
4. special configurations of quarters space to accommodate moveable personal property,
including computer cabling, conduit and plenums and raised floors to accommodate computer
cabling.
The County pays for:
1. building, parking and permanent fixtures including fixed jury and witness chairs, judges’
benches, other built-in furniture and any other items reasonably expected to remain part of the
building;
2. voice, data and low-voltage infrastructure systems outside the court quarters in compliance
with the telecommunication standard for building and campus distribution systems promulgated
by the general services department or the office of the new mexico chief information officer;
3. general security for the building in which the quarters are located, including locks, sprinkler
systems, door and fire alarms, fire extinguishers and security personnel; and
4. window and floor coverings;
5. “maintenance service" applies only to the adequate quarters and necessary utilities provided
by the county; and
6. “necessary utilities" means electricity, lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation, plumbing and
restroom facilities and garbage, refuse and recycling services
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Administrative Office of the Courts states that the financial impact to the state is unknown
because it is based upon how many courthouses will be built or renovated in the future. One
ongoing cost to the county is security personnel. At this time, the counties pay an estimated
$4,000.0 for court security personnel costs.
The Administrative Office of the District Attorney states that this bill will affect the local
county’s budget as well as the District Court and District Attorney’s budget in terms of certain
capital outlay and recurring costs.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 491/a SJC/a SFC – Page
3
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
According to the Administrative Office of the Courts, there is confusion between the state and
the counties on the respective financial responsibilities of each, although the statute requires the
counties to be responsible for the space of the district courts statewide. Both the counties, the
state and the district courts would benefit from clear definitions or guidelines. This allows the
district courts to submit concrete budgets to the Legislature for funding of utilities and/or
services not covered by the county. The courts can then move forward in obtaining facilities that
are safe and functional for the public and court staff.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The Administrative Office of the District Attorney notes the following technical issue:
Section 34-6-24 as previously existing and in the current proposed bill states that the
county shall provide facilities for juvenile probation services. At the time the original statute was
enacted juvenile probation services were an entity of the district court. They are now under the
Children, Youth & Families Department. It is unclear whether the county or the CY&FD should
be the appropriate source for the facilities expense.
The bill does not clarify which entity would be responsible for structural upgrades for
handicapped access. However, that issue may be covered by existing state and federal authority.
BS/mt:nt