Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Grubesic
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/29/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Amending the Retiree Health Care Act
SB 502
ANALYST Propst
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total $1,012.0 $3,400.0 $3,808.0 $8,220.0 Recurring RHCA
Benefit
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 502 amends the Retiree Health Care Act to include domestic partners and surviving
domestic partners as individuals eligible to participate in the provision of health care coverage
provided for retirees of certain public participating employers, their spouses and dependents.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
RHCA calculated the estimated additional net cost to RHCA in extending health care coverage to
domestic partners base on the actual number of domestic partners currently receiving health care
benefits through the Risk Management Division (5.03% of the lives covered). The FY07 net
cost to RHCA was used for the FY07 estimate, assuming four months of FY07 would receive the
same number of domestic partners as participants. For FY08 and FY09, a 10% increase in health
care cost was used with a 2% increase in the number of domestic partners covered (given that
there is no historical data on this population). This assumes RHCA will succeed in achieving a
certain degree of cost containment over the next several years. Based on budgeted FY08 claims
cost of $184,000.0, this $3,000.0 increase would result in an additional 1.8% in claims dollar
paid out by RHCA.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 502 – Page
2
The chart below is the calculation for providing health care coverage to the domestic partners of
employees at Risk Management Division that are currently receiving their health care coverage
through RMD. The costs used are the net cost incurred by RHCA for non-Medicare and
Medicare spouse participants in FY06.
Depending on the growth in number of domestic partners covered, an additional Customer
Service Representative may become necessary to accommodate the members. The approximate
cost of an additional CSR, including benefits, would be $33.7 per year. This amount was not
included in the table below or in the operating budget impact above.
Domestic Partner Estimate
Assuming NMRHCA allows domestic partner coverage for same retiree contribution as
spouse(1)
State RMD Domestic Partner coverage rate
5.03%
Count
Assumed
Participation
Domestic
Partners
RHCA Spousal
Cost Per Month
FY07
Projected
Annual Cost
Pre-Medicare Retirees 9,902
5.03%
498
$294.19 $1,758,079.00
Post-Medicare Retirees 16,490
5.03%
829
$128.41
$1,277,423.00
Total
26,392
1,327
$3,035,502.00
(1) If the domestic partner paid the full spousal premium for coverage with no contribution
from
NMRHCA the cost would be reduced, but not eliminated unless the spouse rates were
recalculated
to cover the full experience rates of spouses.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
According to RHCA, it is unclear at this time whether or not the 2% per annum growth in the
number of domestic partners assumed to receive health care benefits through the RHCA is too
conservative. If it were a higher rate of growth, it would negatively impact the increase in
expenditure for the RHCA.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
RHCA notes that, under the current Retiree Health Care Act, if a retiree becomes divorced from
a spouse, there is a divorce decree that is filed and it states that the spouse becomes ineligible for
health care coverage. Currently, there is no formal legal process for the dissolution of a domestic
partnership. The question remains as to whether the RHCA would be at risk for continuing to
provide health care coverage to individuals that are no longer the domestic partner of an eligible
retiree.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
How does GSD handle the issue of dissolution of a domestic partnership and its impact
on beneficiaries’ eligibility.
WEP/mt