Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Robinson
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/8/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Remove Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities
SB 522
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 522 would enact a new section providing that “The common law rule against
perpetuities as it applies to New Mexico is abrogated." The bill would also repeal the statutory
“rule against perpetuities" set forth in New Mexico’s Uniform Probate Code in NMSA Sections
45-2-901- to 45-2-906.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The effect of this bill would be to abolish any rule of perpetuities in New Mexico, thereby
allowing testators to earmark property for ownership, use or enjoyment by persons in the infinite
future for generations to come.
According to the AGO, the “rule against perpetuities" is a rule in property law that prohibits a
grant of property from “vesting" (entitling the beneficiary to present or future ownership, use or
enjoyment of property) beyond a certain period of time. It is intended to prevent people from
tying up assets for too long a period of time and is concerned with the “utility" of property. The
purpose of the rule is to limit a testator’s power to earmark property gifts for remote descendants.
Attempts to do so beyond the so-called “common law" period or beyond superceding statutory
periods are void. Examples of such attempts usually involve contingencies requiring a
pg_0002
Senate Bill 522 – Page
2
beneficiary to reach a certain age or to survive other beneficiaries. (e.g. leaving property in trust
with the income going to a succession of beneficiaries, then the corpus to other beneficiaries if
they live to a certain age and if they do not, to charity, etc.)
The common law rule against perpetuities, as defined by the Deluxe Eighth Edition of Black’s
Law Dictionary, prohibits a grant of an estate unless the interest must vest, if it all, no later than
21 years (plus a period of gestation to cover a posthumous birth) after the death of some person
alive when the interest was created." This bill “abrogates", or abolishes, that rule which
presumably would apply if the superceding statutes are repealed.
New Mexico has superceded the common law rule against perpetuities by adopting the Uniform
Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on
Uniform State Laws. The statutory rule contains two components: 1) a nonvested property
interest is valid when it is created if it is certain to vest, or is certain to fail to vest, within 21
years after the death of an individual then actually alive; and 2) if an interest is not certain to
either vest or terminate within the 21 year period, it must vest within ninety years of its creation
or it terminates. The bill also repeals those statutes.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to AOC, the common law Rule against Perpetuities basically governs how long
property can be tied up in a trust. As Professor Neil Harl, economics professor at Iowa State,
explains, “The Rule has come to stand for the proposition that interests in trust must vest, if at
all, not later than 21 years after the last to die of a class of lives in being at the creation of the
interest in trust. As a practical matter, that has tended to impose a maximum term of 100 to 125
years for property to be held in trust."
EO/nt