Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR M. Sanchez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/6/2007
2/23/2007 HB
SHORT TITLE Mechanic, Materialmen and Contractor Liens
SB 574/a SCONC/a SJC
ANALYST Schuss
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SJC Amendment
The amendment proposed by the Senate Judiciary Committee removes Clarifying Mechanics’
and Materialmen’s lien rights in other than fee interests from the title. The amendment also
removes Section 1 in its entirety. Section 1 amended 48-2-2 and was titled Mechanics and
Materialmen – Lien – Labor, Equipment and Materials Furnished – Definition of Agent of
Owner.
Synopsis of SCONC Amendment
The Senate Conservation Committee amendments to Senate Bill 574 eliminate language in the
original bill providing that a contract, agreement or understanding that contains a waiver of the
right to file or enforce a lien created pursuant to Sections 48-2-1 through 48-2-17 NMSA 1978 is
void as against public policy and unenforceable.
In lieu of that language, the amendments add a provision to NMSA Section 48-2-10 of the
pg_0002
Senate Bill 574/a SCONC/a SJC – Page
2
Mechanic’s and Materialmen’s lien statutes which would provide:
"A contingent payment clause in a contract shall not be construed as a waiver of the right
to file and enforce a mechanic's or materialman's lien pursuant to Sections 48-2-1 through 48-2-
17 NMSA 1978."
The AGO lists the following significant issues:
The amendments eliminate language which effectively prohibited the inclusion of lien
waiver language in contracts. They also allow the filing of a lien on real property for the
provision of labor, equipment, or machinery, regardless of whether the contract contains a
contingent payment clause.
Construction managers, general contractors and subcontractors commonly use
conditional payment clauses to shift the financial risk of a project to lower-tier subcontractors
and suppliers. Contingent payment provisions are commonly referred to as “pay-if-paid" or
“pay-when-paid" provisions. By accepting a contingent payment provision, a lower-tier
contractor or supplier assumes increased risk that third parties will fail to meet their financial or
performance obligations on the project. The amendments to this bill would confer the right to file
and enforce a lien regardless of whether the contract between the filer and the contractor contains
those provisions.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 574 amends various sections of state law relating to mechanics and materialmen’s
liens. Specifically, the bill:
Confers the right to a lien if labor, equipment, tools, or material is hauled or furnished
at the instance of the owner of any interest in the building or improvement, or the
owner’s agent;
Exempts the “original contractor" from the current requirement that notice be given to
the owner or original contractor of the lien claimant’s right to claim a lien in the event
of non-payment;
Allows the original contractor to petition the district court for cancellation of a
subcontractors lien;
Prohibits an owner or contractor from providing a single security for the cancellation
of the lien of more than one claimant;
Allows the commencement of binding arbitration proceedings to toll the 2 year time
period maintaining the validity of a lien;
Provides that a contract that waives the right to file or enforce a lien is against public
policy and void and unenforceable;
pg_0003
Senate Bill 574/a SCONC/a SJC – Page
3
Prevents an owner from withholding funds owed a contractor during the pendency of
a lien action if the lien was asserted as a result of the owner's failure to pay the
contractor for work done and materials furnished;
Provides that a prevailing party in a dispute arising out of or relating to a lien action is
entitled to recover from the other party reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
According to the AGO, the bill amends NMSA Section 48-2-12 to add the title
“CONTRACTOR LIABLE FOR LIENS OF SUBCONTRACTORS". However, that section
does not make the contractor “liable" for those liens, but only allows the contractor to recover
amounts due to him/her, after deducting all subcontractor claims.
Further, the bill amends that section to allow an owner to withhold the amount of money from
the contractor for which the lien was filed during the pendency of an action to recover on the lien
“unless the lien was asserted as a result of the owner's failure to pay the contractor for work done
and materials furnished". It is unclear as to circumstances which might exist other than the
owner’s failure to pay which would allow a contractor to assert a lien. This amendment
presumably would require the owner to pay the contractor all funds claimed during the pendency
of the action.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The AOC states that there will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution
and documentation of statutory changes. Any additional fiscal impact on the judiciary would be
proportional to the enforcement of this law and petitions for orders canceling liens. New laws,
amendments to existing laws and new hearings have the potential to increase caseloads in the
courts, thus requiring additional resources to handle the increase.
BS/mt