Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Altamirano
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/17/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Higher Education Faculty Endowment Fund
SB 645
ANALYST Williams
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$25,000.0 Non-Recurring
General Fund
See Narrative
Faculty Endowment
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
$25,000.0
Non-Recurring
Faculty
Endowment
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to SB 260 and HB 292
Relates to LFC budget recommendation of $25 million in non-recurring in FY07 to the faculty
endowment fund.
Relates to Executive budget recommendation of $12 million in nonrecurring in FY08 to the
faculty endowment fund
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Higher Education Department (HED)
pg_0002
Senate Bill 645 – Page
2
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 645 appropriates $25 million from the General Fund to the faculty endowment fund.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $25 million in fiscal year 2008 contained in this bill is a non-recurring
expense to the general fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of
a fiscal year would not revert. This bill provides for continuing appropriations from the faculty
endowment fund.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Under current law, the three research institutions and the UNM School of Medicine are eligible
to participate in the endowed chair program, while six of the state’s universities are eligible to
participate in endowed professorships and endowed faculty development programs. Half of the
disbursements are to be for endowed chairs, 35 percent are designated for endowed
professorships and 15 percent are for endowed faculty development programs. Matching fund
requirements are as follows:
a.
Endowed chair: $500,000
b.
Endowed professorships: $200,000
c.
Endowed faculty programs, to include lectureships, graduate fellowships
and other faculty support programs: $37,500 for each program
According to Volume II of the LFC budget recommendation: “The committee recommends
consideration of nonrecurring funding of up to $25 million for endowed chairs at the state’s four-
year and two-year postsecondary institutions. The endowed-chair funding achieves several
legislative objectives. The funding provides a mechanism for partnering with noninstitutional
funding organizations, attracting, retaining, and creating incentives for enhanced student
learning, scholarship, and research as well as supporting the multi-faceted missions of the state’s
institutions.
The surplus of nonrecurring general fund monies provides an opportunity to invest in this
initiative because the distributions from the endowment are used for operating purposes of the
endowed faculty positions.
Expansion of the program to two-year institutions will require changes to 21-1-27.1 NMSA 1978
to reward enhanced student learning activities of faculty at those institutions."
According to the Executive Budget in Brief “Path to Progress, Expanding Opportunity", January
2007: the executive proposal is to “retain and attract high-caliber faculty to the State’s higher
education institutions by creating endowed chairs, particularly in specialized, high-need fields.
Institutions must provide matching funds from private sources, which helps engage the private
sector and alumni."
pg_0003
Senate Bill 645 – Page
3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
In past years, in determining prior-year institutional draw downs from the faculty endowment
fund, the Commission on Higher Education, now the HED, has required the university to provide
a letter signed by the chair of the board of regents, the president, and the chief financial officer
declaring:
1)
that an endowment account has been established for receipt both of the monies from
the Fund and the non-governmental matching monies;
2)
which kind of endowment is being established (i.e., a chair, professorship, or faculty
development program);
3)
administration of the Fund meets the requirements of Section 21-1-38 NMSA 1978;
and
4)
identification of the source of the non-governmental monies and their permanent
commitment to the endowment.
Faculty endowment funds at institutions are contributing to strong bond ratings for those
institutions.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The legislature may wish to consider a time limit for qualifying institutions to be able to
drawdown the funding.
The legislature may wish to consider requiring reporting to LFC and the Department of Finance
and Administration on disbursements to each institution, the amount of matching funds and their
source and the purpose of the endowments.
ALTERNATIVES
House Bill 338/Senate Bill 240 from 2006 legislative session.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
What is the most effective level of private contribution match to maximize non-state
matching funds, while enabling effective participation in the faculty endowment program
by various institutions.
AW/mt:nt